Viewing 15 posts - 52,711 through 52,725 (of 59,098 total)
Heh... that's funny. Not what I intended but sure is true.
What's in the box with just a slider is a single line of code about 480 characters wide... totally...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 1, 2008 at 11:08 am
Didn't see Kevin's latest post...
That'll be nice to have when 2k8 comes out. I thought you were saying that it's a viable 2k5 solution. Sorry for the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 1, 2008 at 11:02 am
TheSQLGuru (2/1/2008)
Yes, that would be the missing ORDER BY and ROWS subclauses...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 1, 2008 at 10:57 am
TheSQLGuru (2/1/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 1, 2008 at 7:53 am
Carla Wilson (1/31/2008)
Thanks for the great examples on generating running totals. Question: You mentioned that you have to include the "anchor" (or dummy) in the update statement in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 1, 2008 at 7:49 am
Christian Buettner (2/1/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 1, 2008 at 7:24 am
ALZDBA (2/1/2008)
I'm very sorry to have to tell you that it fails with partitioned objects on SQL2005.
Thanks for the code, Johan... I'll check it out! And thanks for taking...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 1, 2008 at 7:14 am
Matt Miller (1/30/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2008 at 11:16 pm
I've gotta agree with that!
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2008 at 11:06 pm
Darrin Blunt (1/31/2008)
I am curious how...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2008 at 10:35 pm
RichardB (1/31/2008)
Run over 1.4million records on a 6 level 'hierarchy' in about 10 s - compared to the 'set' solution that takes 1.5hrs...
:exclamationmark:
Oh yes, and validation against the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2008 at 9:40 pm
Philippe Cand (1/31/2008)
Wether or not something is supported by Microsoft does not make it safer.
It is all about probability and bugs....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2008 at 9:36 pm
James Goodwin (1/31/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2008 at 9:21 pm
However, the engine has no obligation to scan the table in index order, as there are no language constructs which impose an ordering on the execution order of a scan....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2008 at 9:11 pm
Ian Yates (1/31/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2008 at 8:47 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 52,711 through 52,725 (of 59,098 total)