Viewing 15 posts - 50,881 through 50,895 (of 59,091 total)
It's not possible to help without knowing either the content of the various variables or you printing out the value of the variable you're trying to execute.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 30, 2008 at 7:03 am
Sorry, Rajesh... didn't see the last line of your post... same idea.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2008 at 11:57 pm
I wish all books came on a DVD... easy to search, easy to carry. Of course, a couple/three 1,400 page books make a pretty good anti-terrorist weapon on a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2008 at 11:56 pm
PhilPacha (4/25/2008)
If there are no foreign keys on the table, simply TRUNCATE TABLE [YourTableName]
Hey guys! Didn't you see PhilPacha's post? That's the way to do it... truncating a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2008 at 11:52 pm
Ummm, then why did you post that you wanted to process rows one at a time? We've all said that's a bad thing... what is it that you're trying...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2008 at 11:46 pm
The other thing to be considered, it what the new rows are in the RecipeLine table are... you'll need to pass those ID's back to the GUI, won't you?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2008 at 11:40 pm
Oh, crud... I just thought of this... If you're using it for that, it's possible that two people could conflict with each other and get the wrong rows...
We've gotta come...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2008 at 11:35 pm
shalini_pdi (4/29/2008)
from one location to other location to reduce the time of dataentry
Perfect... that's what I was looking for. Thank you so much.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2008 at 11:33 pm
Heh... Yeaup... I know that... what I want to know is why you need to clone rows like this...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2008 at 11:20 pm
Rob Goddard (4/29/2008)
shalini_pdi (4/29/2008)
Hi,Could any explain how to fetch row by row with out using cursor.
Like everyone has said, you need to give at least demo table structures and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2008 at 11:16 pm
Oh... not what I was looking for... I wanted to know why you needed to do this, please...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2008 at 11:14 pm
Say... do you happen to have the full test slab for that 16 second version?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2008 at 11:13 pm
Matt Miller (4/29/2008)
(1000000 row(s) affected)
=====================
Jeff's Statistical Median Calc
=====================
(70266 row(s) affected)
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 70031 ms, elapsed time = 42039 ms.
========================
Matt's Mathematical Median...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2008 at 11:11 pm
And if the query returns a million rows, then what?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2008 at 10:06 pm
So... did that work for you or what?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2008 at 9:51 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 50,881 through 50,895 (of 59,091 total)