Viewing 15 posts - 50,776 through 50,790 (of 59,102 total)
Sure... when you're using QA, you may run the same thing more than once. Data is cached and everything looks rosy because of it.
If you really want...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2008 at 9:35 pm
Gosh, I sure hope so, Lester. Thank you for the confidence. I look at some of the articles I've written and say to myself, "Everyone probably knows that...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2008 at 9:29 pm
susheereddy (5/4/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2008 at 9:23 pm
jeff.williams3188 (5/4/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2008 at 9:19 pm
Hi Bill,
Ok... understood about the "cell" being the intersection of a row/column. Guess I need to see raw data without any split attempt on your part. Could you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2008 at 9:14 pm
I agree... judging from some of the "Why am I getting this error" questions on the forum, implicit conversions to "bite" people a lot. This "simple" question is a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2008 at 10:07 am
susheereddy (5/3/2008)
can i accomplish the same task by using xp_cmdshell and bulk insert... because we are using sql server 2000
DTS in SQL Server 2000 is kinda like SSIS in SQL...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2008 at 9:39 am
3 Marks isn't bad or good... it means "average" and it is an "Average" question. 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2008 at 9:30 am
The bottom line is that I don't know exactly what you're trying to do and can't help unless I understand. Parsing isn't difficult at all... if you can spend...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2008 at 9:20 am
Ok... I'm starting to feel like I'm being trolled a bit here, Bill.
What else is in the table besides that... show more than 1 "record" please.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2008 at 9:09 am
Yes.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2008 at 9:08 am
peace2007 (5/3/2008)
Did you go buy the number of processors and create a files for each i.e if have 4 processors do you have 4 files for tempdb ..just curious.
So...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 4, 2008 at 8:56 am
You have a table with a single column and no external identifiers? Did you read the URL I pointed you to? You're not providing enough information for anyone...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 3, 2008 at 5:18 pm
First, take a look at the URL in my signature to get better help, faster. 😉
Following my own "rules", here some test tables and some test data...
--===== Presets
...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 3, 2008 at 1:33 pm
In "old" SQL Server 2000, "schema" was actually called "owner". It's the login or role that owns the object. It's assigned when the object is created and defaults...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 3, 2008 at 10:07 am
Viewing 15 posts - 50,776 through 50,790 (of 59,102 total)