Viewing 15 posts - 50,011 through 50,025 (of 59,091 total)
Oh no... Correlated sub-queries and their equivelant of Cross Apply are nothing more than a form of hidden RBAR which is usually as slow as a cursor and sometimes slower...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 6:15 am
"If we let our employer know of the trade-off between delivery schedule and future-proofing/performance tweaking, they can make an informed decision."
I've found that that usually takes more time than just...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 6:11 am
Please see the following to get the best performance out of a concatenation function...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Test+Data/61572/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 5:56 am
michaela (6/15/2008)
What I would do:...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 15, 2008 at 8:08 pm
Sorry folks... I've repaired the link that BitBucket was talking about and I've also included it here...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/TSQL/62867/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 15, 2008 at 7:28 pm
Ummm.... SysProcesses has a DBID column...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 15, 2008 at 7:21 pm
kinnon_2000 (6/15/2008)
I dont know of a sql server query that could concatinate multiple fields from a tabe, as a join, into a single field. Can that be done?
Absolutely... see...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 15, 2008 at 5:33 pm
"Clustered DB Files"??? :blink:
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 15, 2008 at 5:16 pm
Virtual Machine is software that looks like hardware. Do you think software will ever be as performant as hardware? 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 15, 2008 at 5:15 pm
Sure... let's shed some light on this... this sounds like you're processing one row at a time... That's RBAR and that's a mistake. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 15, 2008 at 5:10 pm
In fact... it doesn't even have to refer to a table to be RBAR... and split function based on a While loop is a form of RBAR and performance can...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 15, 2008 at 5:07 pm
Bottom line is, if the function, inline or not, refers to a table, it's a form of RBAR that may have a significant impact on performance whether the execution plan...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 15, 2008 at 5:04 pm
rbarryyoung (6/15/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 15, 2008 at 5:02 pm
Then the XML solution will work.
Just curious... why did you post on a 2k forum instead of a 2k5 forum? Folks wouldn't have wasted their time trying...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 15, 2008 at 4:55 pm
BitBucket... I've got 100 PM's that I really want to keep. Steve hasn't come up with a way to download them, yet. Send me an email...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 15, 2008 at 4:47 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 50,011 through 50,025 (of 59,091 total)