Viewing 15 posts - 49,996 through 50,010 (of 59,099 total)
GSquared (6/16/2008)
I have some examples where hardware was a solution. See if you agree with them:
Yes... we did something similar at work... we changed from SQL Server Standard Edition...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 9:38 pm
HYDNIZ (6/16/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 9:27 pm
Outstanding... thanks for the feedback, Matt. And, I'm sorry... I didn't realize that you were already beating the distinct drum on the usage of the function...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 9:10 pm
Basically, explain what you did here and expound upon how this technique can be applied elsewhere... you will be successful...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic511356-61-1.aspx
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 9:07 pm
karthikeyan (6/16/2008)
I have to give a presentation to my manager, my manager's manager, again, his manager ( upto 3 level) over my tuning work tomorrow.
What have you done in the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 9:04 pm
TheSQLGuru (6/16/2008)
Jeff, I have referenced the Running Totals thread at least 10 times now on various MS forums, including the MVP private one.
Thank you for the awesome honor,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 8:56 pm
Ummmm.... sorry Matt... the function is not written correctly and it has not been called correctly. The function has two extra SET statements which slows it down and the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 8:41 pm
Pierre Boucher (6/16/2008)
So, if you see my resume at your company, I will deny ever writing that code :ermm:
Pierre... I think I like your attitude... alot!:)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 8:06 pm
Matt Miller (6/16/2008)
Jeff Moden (6/16/2008)
jcrawf02 (6/16/2008)
...you should just run sp_ASPCA and solve the problemHeh... I've found that it also works great on some developers 😀
You can try that, but the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 2:50 pm
Heh... cool... I finally beat Mr. Miller at a response... 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 2:47 pm
adi.cohen (6/16/2008)
I'm realy sorry for this...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 2:42 pm
jcrawf02 (6/16/2008)
...you should just run sp_ASPCA and solve the problem
Heh... I've found that it also works great on some developers 😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 2:40 pm
Pierre Boucher (6/16/2008)
Those tests consists of calculating the running total for one field in the table. Both versions does exactly the same thing.
Right up my alley... no need for...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 2:37 pm
Crud... Matt beat me to it... 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 2:33 pm
rbarryyoung (6/16/2008)
Jeff Moden (6/16/2008)
rbarryyoung (6/16/2008)
Jeff Moden (6/15/2008)
rbarryyoung (6/15/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 16, 2008 at 2:29 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 49,996 through 50,010 (of 59,099 total)