Viewing 15 posts - 49,246 through 49,260 (of 59,091 total)
Loner (7/11/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2008 at 6:01 pm
rameshchandra.a (7/11/2008)
If a WHILE loop is involved, then each will suck as bad as the other
5.What is CTE(Common Table...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2008 at 5:42 pm
Heh... I always get what I want because the best things in life... are not things. 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2008 at 5:27 pm
mblack (7/11/2008)
Msg 102, Level 15, State 1, Line 23
Incorrect syntax near ')'.
Other than...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2008 at 5:11 pm
... or correlated subquery.
Spot on, Gus. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2008 at 5:08 pm
Bijal Parekh (7/10/2008)
You can try using while loop where cursor is used
Why? What do you think a cursor is, anyway? It's nothing but an internal table with a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2008 at 5:05 pm
antonio.collins (7/10/2008)
coalesce_negative( 1, 1, 1,-1, 1,-1,-1,-1,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2008 at 4:58 pm
rbarryyoung (7/11/2008)
this was never possible with the old syntax
That's not true...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2008 at 4:52 pm
Heh... good idea... just remember that TRUNCATE won't work in the presence of Foreign Keys... 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2008 at 4:46 pm
rbarryyoung (7/11/2008)
What are you hoping to get from us?
What Barry means is that you've given us nothing but symptoms. The problem is going to be what appears in the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2008 at 4:43 pm
What you've requested is not a Pivot... it's a "simple" aggregation. Since you've not identified the datatypes involved, I have to make certain assumptions. Please see the link...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2008 at 4:38 pm
Heh... I agree, Michael... there's always that. 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2008 at 3:36 pm
GilaMonster (7/11/2008)
Jeff Moden (7/11/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2008 at 3:24 pm
Heh... they already have one! It's called the DATETIME datatype! What they really need is just a simpler way of formatting and they need to allow for the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2008 at 11:05 am
If you're talking about RBAR update/select pairs, that's just a bad programming practice... between the proprietary UPDATE SET @variable = columnname = expression and the OUTPUT clause available in 2005,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2008 at 10:34 am
Viewing 15 posts - 49,246 through 49,260 (of 59,091 total)