Viewing 15 posts - 48,466 through 48,480 (of 59,065 total)
bumey309 (9/1/2008)
Why is it not recommended to have the database and transaction logs on the same drive? What will be the cause if ever?
The biggest reason is simply performance. ...
September 1, 2008 at 6:39 pm
Jeffrey Williams (9/1/2008)
September 1, 2008 at 6:35 pm
Christopher Stobbs (9/1/2008)
Type is there for backward compatibility
I wonder why some of the folks from Redmond saw fit to use it to define some of the information schema views if...
September 1, 2008 at 6:28 pm
Heh... I'm thinking this is strong justification for tele-commuting. 😛 Let's all become agoraphobic and avoid the epidemic, conspiracys, and a modicum of common sense. 😉
September 1, 2008 at 6:25 pm
Do like Excel does... do the calculations using FLOAT (Barry implied it with 100.0) and then round the answer to the correct number of decimal points for display. If...
September 1, 2008 at 6:18 pm
OpenRowset cannot take variables as part of it's syntax. You'll need to do the whole OpenRowset thing as dynamic SQL.
September 1, 2008 at 5:40 pm
As previously suggested, have you looked into "parameter sniffing"? Google it.
Also, are there any settings differences between the two servers like "auto statistics", etc. Last but not least,...
September 1, 2008 at 5:38 pm
It could simply be a case of "parameter sniffing"... Google it.
Also, are "auto statisics" enabled or not?
September 1, 2008 at 5:34 pm
Richard Fryar (9/1/2008)
There is a sneaky way of doing this described here:
Heh... I love "sneaky". That's awesome! Thanks for the tip! 🙂
EDIT - BEWARE !!!! THE LINK ABOVE...
September 1, 2008 at 5:31 pm
Pulkit Lall (8/31/2008)
So, the answer is 5 resultsets with 5...
September 1, 2008 at 3:05 pm
GilaMonster (9/1/2008)
If today's programmers can count on faster disk drives, essentially memory speed, are we going to see more and more bad SQL in tomorrow's databases?
Of course, because there are...
September 1, 2008 at 3:03 pm
Ah... got it... thanks for the feedback.
Still, if the table were properly normalized, this would be a piece of cake. 🙂
September 1, 2008 at 3:01 pm
Good article!
You did forget to mention one workaround for the UDT's that would allow it to work across all databases including TempDB... Define the UDT in the Master...
September 1, 2008 at 2:56 pm
gan (8/31/2008)
I get 1469283328 for that. Sorry I do not quite understand what you are trying to explain. Can elaborate more? 😀
Yes... but please look at the actual execution plan...
September 1, 2008 at 2:29 pm
balbirsinghsodhi (9/1/2008)
September 1, 2008 at 2:18 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 48,466 through 48,480 (of 59,065 total)