Viewing 15 posts - 48,001 through 48,015 (of 59,095 total)
Thanks, Jackal. I sure appreciate it. I'll take a look.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 6:23 am
I'm thinking there are two schools of thought on that... a system that constantly updates indexes like SQL Server for new rows, and a system that has never seen the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 9:17 pm
Thanks... any chance of you posting that script?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 9:07 pm
What's your point, Andrew? You said the code didn't work... I told you why it didn't. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 9:02 pm
Jackal (10/1/2008)
As execution plans for procedures are case sensitive.
Please show me a Microsoft document or viable test code that proves that. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 8:57 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 8:49 pm
Dunno about that, Mark... I've never had a problem with xp_DirTree and UNC's. If SQL Server can see it, xp_Dirtree can read it in my humble experiences.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 8:43 pm
Brandie Tarvin (10/1/2008)
Just curious... How is performance (read/write) on those insane indexes of yours, Jeff?
I don't know any gentle way to say it... Inserts, updates, and the occasional block delete...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 8:38 pm
Crud... I was hoping they were unique so we could use xp_Dirtree to solve your problem very easily. xp_FileExists is not available in SQL Server 2k8 like it is...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 9:38 am
I agree... if the VB code works and there is no impact on performance, there's no reason to change horses right now.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 7:02 am
Thanks. Oh, and the randomness comes from the fact that NEWID generates random numbers. If you order by a random number like that, the result will be in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 6:57 am
samsql (10/1/2008)
how many rows are there with 3 not null values and
how many rows are there with 4 not null values
from column image1 to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 6:18 am
I've answered several of your questions and provided a code solution... the least you could do is answer just one of mine... what is the purpose of this code?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 6:04 am
bhuvnesh.dogra (9/30/2008)
we need to show record randomly
Heh... I already know that... but, why is it a requirement? What is it that you are trying to do? ie. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 11:30 pm
A CTE is nothing more than a "derived table" or an "inline view"... both of which are just sub-queries. If you did it the "old way" without a CTE,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 30, 2008 at 11:16 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 48,001 through 48,015 (of 59,095 total)