Viewing 15 posts - 48,001 through 48,015 (of 59,102 total)
Jackal (10/2/2008)
The following article contains a sample test.
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Performance+Tuning+and+Scaling/hitsandmisses/1776/
When I replicated the test (in SS2K), it did appear to be as the article listed. However, re-doing the test this...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 8:51 pm
Andrew Gothard (10/2/2008)
J (10/2/2008)
For my taste, I find this harder to read (mid-50 eyesight and all), it requires more attention to figure out the meaning of the name. I feel...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 8:22 pm
Jackal (10/2/2008)
I'm not saying that a dba's views would be ignored and I dont want to wonder off track. It's just in situations I have worked in, business...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 8:20 pm
Jackal (10/2/2008)
No problem, let me your views when you've had a look.
Just on another point, ANSI 89 vs ANSI 92, do you know where I can find a quick...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 8:14 pm
John Oliver (10/2/2008)
It is always troubling when you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 7:55 pm
Jackal (10/2/2008)
J (10/2/2008)
Would it...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 7:50 pm
John Oliver (10/2/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 7:26 pm
Thanks, Jackal. I sure appreciate it. I'll take a look.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 6:23 am
I'm thinking there are two schools of thought on that... a system that constantly updates indexes like SQL Server for new rows, and a system that has never seen the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 9:17 pm
Thanks... any chance of you posting that script?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 9:07 pm
What's your point, Andrew? You said the code didn't work... I told you why it didn't. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 9:02 pm
Jackal (10/1/2008)
As execution plans for procedures are case sensitive.
Please show me a Microsoft document or viable test code that proves that. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 8:57 pm
Thanks for the feedback, John. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 8:49 pm
Dunno about that, Mark... I've never had a problem with xp_DirTree and UNC's. If SQL Server can see it, xp_Dirtree can read it in my humble experiences.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 8:43 pm
Brandie Tarvin (10/1/2008)
Just curious... How is performance (read/write) on those insane indexes of yours, Jeff?
I don't know any gentle way to say it... Inserts, updates, and the occasional block delete...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 1, 2008 at 8:38 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 48,001 through 48,015 (of 59,102 total)