Viewing 15 posts - 47,986 through 48,000 (of 59,095 total)
Actually, I was talking about SQL Server 2000 'cause I'm still stuck in that world for better or worse. I forgot this was a 2k5 forum.
I just setup a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 3, 2008 at 4:58 pm
This is what happens when an OP doesn't post the correct requirements.
Sam... please read and heed the article at the link in my signature. I'm pretty much all...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 3, 2008 at 5:51 am
Andrew Gothard (10/3/2008)
...it's a snakepit of cursors and totally unnecessary temp tables and runs forever?
You just described the code at my new job... 😛 except instead of cursors, it's...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 3, 2008 at 5:34 am
I believe everyone knows what I'm going to say... good code can save a "slow" machine. I've seen too many people go down the primrose path of buying more...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 9:55 pm
Heh... the need for "bins" also explains the "Sort in TempB" option when rebuilding indexes. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 9:40 pm
Sure... first, you have to know what a card sorter is...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_80_series_Card_Sorters
Then, read the part that says...
Multiple column sorting is done by first sorting the least significant column, then proceeding, column...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 9:38 pm
TheSQLGuru (10/2/2008)
I believe you are...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 9:22 pm
Heh... No... I'm saying the following is wrong...
FROM sys.tables AS tbl where tbl.[font="Arial Black"]Name[/font] = CAST([font="Arial Black"]object_id(@TableName)[/font] AS VARCHAR(100)) ORDER BY 1
😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 9:15 pm
Jackal (10/2/2008)
The following article contains a sample test.
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Performance+Tuning+and+Scaling/hitsandmisses/1776/
When I replicated the test (in SS2K), it did appear to be as the article listed. However, re-doing the test this...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 8:51 pm
Andrew Gothard (10/2/2008)
J (10/2/2008)
For my taste, I find this harder to read (mid-50 eyesight and all), it requires more attention to figure out the meaning of the name. I feel...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 8:22 pm
Jackal (10/2/2008)
I'm not saying that a dba's views would be ignored and I dont want to wonder off track. It's just in situations I have worked in, business...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 8:20 pm
Jackal (10/2/2008)
No problem, let me your views when you've had a look.
Just on another point, ANSI 89 vs ANSI 92, do you know where I can find a quick...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 8:14 pm
John Oliver (10/2/2008)
It is always troubling when you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 7:55 pm
Jackal (10/2/2008)
J (10/2/2008)
Would it...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 7:50 pm
John Oliver (10/2/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 2, 2008 at 7:26 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 47,986 through 48,000 (of 59,095 total)