Viewing 15 posts - 47,446 through 47,460 (of 59,099 total)
... and, before you get all fired up and start using that or any other concatenation function, you have to read the following to avoid some serious performance problems...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Test+Data/61572/
It...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 9:59 pm
Sridevi (11/3/2008)
I wrote a function and i got the result too.
CREATE FUNCTION select_concat (@A INT )
RETURNS VARCHAR(MAX) AS BEGIN
DECLARE...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 9:55 pm
As someone else said in an earlier post...
M u s t... r e s i s t... t e m p ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 9:46 pm
I'll never understand this type of question.... you're on a forum with a bazillion questions and you ask where you can find questions? 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 9:41 pm
Marios Philippopoulos (10/29/2008)
The main wait type is - by...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 9:31 pm
I believe you've hit upon the only two uses that I'd even think of letting someone write a CLR for. 🙂
The other thing is that, with the exclusion of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 9:24 pm
vkundar (11/3/2008)
Hi,I have a cursor which fetch around 1000 rows from the table.
This step is fast there is no isue.
Heh.... Bzzzzt! Wrong answer! Deduct 10 points! :P...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 9:17 pm
jlp3630 (11/3/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 9:09 pm
bang725 (11/3/2008)
hmmmm..." Not in " will take more time.
Heh... prove it. Got code? 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 9:05 pm
Heh... I beg to differ, Steve. You did NOT compromise. You simply made it easier for someone else to do the work and, as it turns out, may...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 9:01 pm
I would suggest you stop looking at costs in either the estimated or actual execution plans because it is frequently very wrong.
For example, given the following test data...
DROP...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 8:42 pm
1. I see no difference in the time when measured properly...
--SELECT GETDATE() as Time
--GO
SET STATISTICS TIME ON
CREATE TABLE #Temp_Example (
[CategoryID] INT NOT NULL,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 8:21 pm
clive (11/3/2008)
Select * from tblContract_Instal1
where Contract_No = 4669
2. Dynamic query: (Clustered Index Seek cost not shown -...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 8:08 pm
Mike Levan (10/31/2008)
I am changing datatype int to varchar(10) whata re the pros and cons, will i lose any data by any chance, what is the gud approach and how.thanks
Ummm......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 8:03 pm
The "E" indicates either "Engineering Notation" or "Scientific Notation". The "E+11" means "Times 10 to the 11th power". It won't fit into an INTEGER, but it will fit...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 7:59 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 47,446 through 47,460 (of 59,099 total)