Viewing 15 posts - 47,446 through 47,460 (of 59,095 total)
Marios Philippopoulos (10/29/2008)
The main wait type is - by...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 9:31 pm
I believe you've hit upon the only two uses that I'd even think of letting someone write a CLR for. 🙂
The other thing is that, with the exclusion of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 9:24 pm
vkundar (11/3/2008)
Hi,I have a cursor which fetch around 1000 rows from the table.
This step is fast there is no isue.
Heh.... Bzzzzt! Wrong answer! Deduct 10 points! :P...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 9:17 pm
jlp3630 (11/3/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 9:09 pm
bang725 (11/3/2008)
hmmmm..." Not in " will take more time.
Heh... prove it. Got code? 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 9:05 pm
Heh... I beg to differ, Steve. You did NOT compromise. You simply made it easier for someone else to do the work and, as it turns out, may...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 9:01 pm
I would suggest you stop looking at costs in either the estimated or actual execution plans because it is frequently very wrong.
For example, given the following test data...
DROP...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 8:42 pm
1. I see no difference in the time when measured properly...
--SELECT GETDATE() as Time
--GO
SET STATISTICS TIME ON
CREATE TABLE #Temp_Example (
[CategoryID] INT NOT NULL,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 8:21 pm
clive (11/3/2008)
Select * from tblContract_Instal1
where Contract_No = 4669
2. Dynamic query: (Clustered Index Seek cost not shown -...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 8:08 pm
Mike Levan (10/31/2008)
I am changing datatype int to varchar(10) whata re the pros and cons, will i lose any data by any chance, what is the gud approach and how.thanks
Ummm......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 8:03 pm
The "E" indicates either "Engineering Notation" or "Scientific Notation". The "E+11" means "Times 10 to the 11th power". It won't fit into an INTEGER, but it will fit...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 7:59 pm
Awesome to know... thanks for the compliment, Seth. I really appreciate it. Heh... I also appreciate you getting to all of these before me! Makes my life...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 7:54 pm
What indexes do you have on the 3 tables?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 7:45 pm
Are you saying that you've revoked base table rights from users on a reporting database? If so, give it back!
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 7:25 pm
Robert,
Take a look at the following article. It explains what a Tally table is, how it works, has a couple of examples including how to split a whole table's...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 3, 2008 at 7:22 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 47,446 through 47,460 (of 59,095 total)