Viewing 15 posts - 46,891 through 46,905 (of 59,101 total)
Thanks, Chris... we posted at just about the same time and I didn't see your post when I posted. Thanks for bailing me out.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 1, 2008 at 5:44 am
Good article... but, because of the title, I was actually expecting to see something about a problem or technique with CTE's that couldn't be done using other forms of code....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 1, 2008 at 5:40 am
Sorry... "Security Violation"... forgot to do a final replace on "SV" before I posted.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 1, 2008 at 5:24 am
Ummmm... you may want to double check the methods above if these are, in fact, virtual machines... even the installation folders may contain nothing but an image of what...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 1, 2008 at 5:19 am
grovelli (12/1/2008)
Can you use the Case statement in Access?
My most sincere apologies... I was just cranking through some posts and didn't notice this was for MS Access... since I don't...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 1, 2008 at 5:08 am
Cool... thanks for the feedback...
Agreed, RegEx Replace is one of the places where a CLR can beat T-SQL. So far as imports with BCP, go... not needed if you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2008 at 8:51 pm
Put this at the beginning of your trigger...
IF @@ROWCOUNT = 0 RETURN
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2008 at 8:14 pm
Unless the output is directed at a format-defined file, date formatting should be done in the GUI.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2008 at 7:53 pm
Just curious... why do you need to do this?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2008 at 7:50 pm
rbarryyoung (11/30/2008)
Jeff Moden (11/29/2008)
Either that, or a partitioned view.
Heh. You know the first time I read this I thought that you said "Partitioned Table". I didn't realize until...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2008 at 7:38 pm
I know Steve will step in on very rare occasions, but, for the most part, nothing get's moderated out of the forums on SQLServerCentral.com. What you see, is what...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2008 at 7:35 pm
Jonathan Kehayias (11/30/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2008 at 7:21 pm
... and I was talking a bit more genericly...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2008 at 9:52 am
GilaMonster (11/30/2008)
Jeff Moden (11/30/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2008 at 9:51 am
Just in case you already read the above, I had forgotten the "END" for each CASE in the code. I've corrected the code.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 30, 2008 at 8:48 am
Viewing 15 posts - 46,891 through 46,905 (of 59,101 total)