Viewing 15 posts - 46,231 through 46,245 (of 59,101 total)
We have the 3 foot cube wall thing... it's great for communication. So far as IM goes, it's ok when it's not abused. I find it totally stupid...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 1, 2009 at 1:13 pm
RBarryYoung (1/1/2009)
Jeff Moden (12/29/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 1, 2009 at 12:43 pm
Heh... Happy New Year to you and your's, Steve!
Man... keep up the awesome work on SSC... I went a visited more than a dozen other sites just to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 1, 2009 at 12:37 pm
Thanks, eramya... but with about 13,000 posts total, I'm thinking it may take more than a week. 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 1, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Man-o-man... I trully hope no one got any feelings hurt... it was all a bit of fun to watch.
Happy New Year, folks! Better times are coming!
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 1, 2009 at 12:30 pm
RBarryYoung (12/31/2008)
Jeff Moden (12/31/2008)
Jay,It's a bit of a misnomer... all single quotes must be turned into 2 single quotes... not actual "double quotes". ... 😛
Hmmm, maybe we should have...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 1, 2009 at 12:23 pm
paulhunter (12/31/2008)
Welcome to the other side of the looking glass.
Heh... more like a one way mirror... could be interpreted as "check valve". 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 1, 2009 at 12:20 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (12/31/2008)
I do think they ought to adhere to a schedule, but not at the expense of bad code.
[font="Arial Black"]FINALLY![/font] That's exactly what I've been saying...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 1, 2009 at 12:18 pm
npfitzner (1/1/2009)
Tom.Thomson (1/1/2009)
He wants to remove the From clause from the Update statement? Seriously?No - I think that's what the 😉 was for.
🙂
Yes! He actually...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 1, 2009 at 12:15 pm
Tom.Thomson (1/1/2009)
Jeff Moden (12/31/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 1, 2009 at 12:14 pm
Heh... yeah... 2.x...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 1, 2009 at 12:11 pm
Bob Hovious (12/31/2008)
Who was it that defined legacy code as the stuff that has been around so long that you finally got most of the bugs out of it?
I don't...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 1, 2009 at 12:06 pm
I think everyone would abuse a "Challenges" forum... might as well label it the "Urgent" forum. 😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 1, 2009 at 12:00 pm
RBarryYoung (12/31/2008)
Actually, Jeff, you should be using SQL_VARIANTS for the V part. That's what they're there for.:D
Uh huh... and someday they'll make all our dreams come true by making...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 1, 2009 at 11:55 am
Make no doubt about it... Cursors are an advanced subject and no new user of T-SQL should be allowed anywhere near a cursor or any other form of RBAR until...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 1, 2009 at 11:46 am
Viewing 15 posts - 46,231 through 46,245 (of 59,101 total)