Viewing 15 posts - 43,996 through 44,010 (of 59,097 total)
Paul White (4/29/2009)
Jeff Moden (4/29/2009)
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63003/
Thanks Jeff,
I have read that before, and use that approach currently.
When Adam asked for ideas to extend the string-split, this came to mind.
It would be interesting...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2009 at 7:55 pm
Ok, here we go... Assuming that you have the company name in a variable and the fact that you're using a version of T-SQL that cannot use functions, here's how...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2009 at 7:30 pm
Paul White (4/28/2009)
Florian Reischl (4/28/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2009 at 6:06 pm
jim.rasmussen (4/28/2009)
Yes it does. I have researched this, but can't seem to make it work correctly. Any thoughts?Thanks
Jim
Sorry, Jim... I had almost 900 emails in my inbox since I posted...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2009 at 5:58 pm
John Bates (4/28/2009)
I will (manually is ok) copy the resultset into an Excel sheet.
Tracking database sizes first day of each month.
Ideally need the sizes (Qty) to be in separate columns.
Thanks,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2009 at 5:42 pm
GilaMonster (4/28/2009)
Lynn Pettis (4/28/2009)
The desert is looking good again...
I might join you this time. For some reason some of the posts over the last few days have been getting to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2009 at 4:41 pm
Grant Fritchey (4/29/2009)
Lynn Pettis (4/29/2009)
GilaMonster (4/29/2009)
Bruce W Cassidy (4/29/2009)
[font="Verdana"]International Star Wars day... "May the 4th be with you."[/font]*groan*
Hmmm, we were discussing having another Starwars day.....
Now for something totally the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2009 at 4:19 pm
JohnG (4/29/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2009 at 4:11 pm
Why does it seem that everything is three to five times harder to do in Oracle than it is in SQL Server?
Heh... it's designed that way. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2009 at 2:40 pm
Scott Roberts (4/29/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2009 at 2:35 pm
Scott Roberts (4/29/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2009 at 12:19 pm
Scott Roberts (4/29/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2009 at 11:58 am
Bob Hovious (4/29/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2009 at 11:54 am
hayzer (4/29/2009)
So far this is just the second best solution around....Never allow such garbage in the DATABASE.. 😀
Prevention is better than cure...
Heh... a kindred spirit. I wish more people...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2009 at 8:47 am
GSquared (4/29/2009)
Absolutely, but that doesn't actually help the person with the original question, who was handed a database that already had this in it.
Actually, it does... the person now knows...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2009 at 8:45 am
Viewing 15 posts - 43,996 through 44,010 (of 59,097 total)