Viewing 15 posts - 43,996 through 44,010 (of 59,063 total)
Adam Machanic (4/27/2009)
I have posted a more scalable SQLCLR string split method here:
Thanks to Paul White for pointing me to this thread. Please consider testing all of these...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 27, 2009 at 6:30 pm
And, sorry... I read past it in the previous post. Lynn is correct... you can only execute extended stored procedures in a function. But what good would it...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 27, 2009 at 6:07 pm
JJ B (4/27/2009)
the vendor has designed their application to force a row-by-row approach because they don't know any better. So as you say, you don't really have a choice other...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 27, 2009 at 6:02 pm
Bruce W Cassidy (4/27/2009)
I find the syntax of cursors annoying and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 27, 2009 at 5:57 pm
Andy DBA (4/27/2009)
Thanks for the post! I bet that blows the function based approach out of the water!
Like anything else, it depends... I've seen it go both ways. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 27, 2009 at 10:56 am
Samuel Vella (4/27/2009)
Any cursor based operation can be replaced with an external application 😛
Absolutely true. But it's still amazing to me what people actually think they need a cursor...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 27, 2009 at 10:53 am
Samuel Vella (4/27/2009)
Jeff Moden (4/27/2009)
Heh... in SQL Server 2005, even that can be done without a cursor. We're just gonna have to wait for it in Barry's series of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 27, 2009 at 10:48 am
Samuel Vella (4/27/2009)
atoth (4/27/2009)
I would love to replace this with set based handling but I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 27, 2009 at 6:36 am
RBarryYoung (4/26/2009)
Not trawling for sympathy on anything folks, just wanted to make sure that you knew what the story was...
Dang, Barry... that's a snootful. Get better soon and don't...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 26, 2009 at 11:26 pm
Nicely done, Barry... I really like the way the story is unfolding in this series... very easy reading, as well. I absolutely agree that you have real life examples...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 26, 2009 at 11:11 pm
Wow... Just looked back at some of the graphs.... I've gotta find out which While Loop and Tally table methods Phil used to come up with his graphs because...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 26, 2009 at 11:50 am
Florian Reischl (4/25/2009)
@jeffSorry, your posted test environment is really good but I need something more flexible and a possibility to run different tests at once.
Heh... no need to apologize, Flo......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 25, 2009 at 11:55 am
Paul White (4/25/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 25, 2009 at 11:29 am
Heh... enough about outsourcing. I don't care what country anyone is from, here's to all the good people that "try" and do what's right every bloody day... and damn...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 25, 2009 at 11:03 am
umar iqbal (4/23/2009)
and I proud to be an americanwhere atleast i feel i am free
Gosh, Umar, I wish some of the folks born here felt the same way. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 25, 2009 at 10:54 am
Viewing 15 posts - 43,996 through 44,010 (of 59,063 total)