Viewing 15 posts - 43,426 through 43,440 (of 59,102 total)
GilaMonster (6/13/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 13, 2009 at 12:30 pm
In that case, I'd add the appropriate indexes to the million row test tables and try the trigger that Paul wrote.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 13, 2009 at 12:27 pm
RBarryYoung (6/13/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 13, 2009 at 12:16 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (6/13/2009)
Congrats Grant and Gail as well!I'm an alternate, fine by me. Jeff, any word for you?
Didn't see my name on the list. Looks like some...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 13, 2009 at 12:13 pm
RBarryYoung (6/13/2009)
Jeff Moden (6/12/2009)
RBarryYoung (6/10/2009)
Jeff Moden (6/10/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 13, 2009 at 11:58 am
I guess my question would be, why do people try to quantify such things a low or high? If your hardware and database server can't handle it, then it's...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 13, 2009 at 11:50 am
WayneS (6/12/2009)
Ahem. It's not very often that someone gets to tell Jeff that he's wrong, AND can prove it...
Heh... wrong for what? If you want to keep the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 13, 2009 at 11:40 am
vishal_mca2005 (6/13/2009)
Thanks Jeff Moden,Thank u very much for my help
Thank you for the feedback.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 13, 2009 at 11:25 am
dxmer (6/13/2009)
Wow, a further explanation that doesn't address the question.
Wow... another smart a$$ed and incorrect comment. I was wrong before... you and your cruddy attitude should leave.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 13, 2009 at 11:19 am
GilaMonster (6/13/2009)
Lynn Pettis (6/13/2009)
Who decides who can vote and who can't, Steve?
Exactly the problem.
SO attempts to solve that by giving points for 'good' and 'correct' answers, and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 13, 2009 at 11:13 am
benoit.rocco (6/13/2009)
I was using SQL Server Management Studio, but connected to a SQL2000 server, it's for that reason the function ROW_NUMBER() didn't exist ^^
Ah... thank you Benoit. That...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 13, 2009 at 11:08 am
Paul White (6/13/2009)
You could also put tempdb on a RAM disk.
Heh... I always forget the simple stuff. 😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 13, 2009 at 11:06 am
I guess the next question would be, how "real time" does the running total thingy need to be? We might be able to eliminate the need for the cursor...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 13, 2009 at 11:01 am
Ok folks... NOW you can test for performance because NOW you can generate substantial amounts of test data quite easily. The following code creates a million rows of randomized...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 13, 2009 at 10:52 am
Aaron (6/13/2009)
That's good feedback.
Heh... I've found that many concurrency issues simply vanish in the presence of high speed code. What I'd be interested in is how fast the trigger...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 13, 2009 at 10:07 am
Viewing 15 posts - 43,426 through 43,440 (of 59,102 total)