Viewing 15 posts - 40,276 through 40,290 (of 59,098 total)
padre (1/14/2010)
I am trying to pivot the following:
RowId DataElementId NumberValue DateValue
1 1 ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 15, 2010 at 8:03 pm
shaini.binu (1/15/2010)
Hi,I have solved the puzzle with the help of cursurs, Thanks for all the help,
Thanks
Sh.
Two way street here, shaini... please post the code...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 15, 2010 at 7:59 pm
Like I implied in your other thread... sometimes senior DBA's are jerks or ring knockers just showing off... But, usually not. Usually they grill you because it's a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 15, 2010 at 7:56 pm
Nitin Kumar Varshney (1/15/2010)
or
use the 5 table inner joines directly in sp's,
which...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 15, 2010 at 7:49 pm
Uh-huh.... and what would you want to do with something like 1d3 and what do you think ISNUMERIC will return for that? Do not use ISNUMERIC as an ISALLDIGITS...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 15, 2010 at 7:45 pm
I agree with the final conclusion here... only experience can rate experience. Even a Software Development Manager may not know enough to interview a DBA candidate to make sure...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 15, 2010 at 7:38 pm
I got ahold of the System's DBA on this problem. Appears there was an aborted attempt at installing SP3 because the instance properties said it was at SP3 but...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 15, 2010 at 7:18 pm
crainlee2 (1/15/2010)
And thanks for your indisputable reply, Gail. It will end all debate on the subject. In answer to your "Why?" question, it's because this particular...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 15, 2010 at 7:13 pm
Also... we have a name for inserting just one row at a time using either method... RBAR which is another four letter word for "slow".
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 15, 2010 at 7:11 pm
"IT DEPENDS". 😉 Test it with multiple different procs yourself and see.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 15, 2010 at 7:09 pm
Heh on me.... I've REALLY got to get into the habit of reading all the posts on a thread before I respond. :blush:
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 15, 2010 at 7:04 pm
lmu92 (1/15/2010)
You need to get the value converted to a "known length".
Either one...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 15, 2010 at 7:03 pm
CirquedeSQLeil (1/15/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 15, 2010 at 7:00 pm
Despite what the interviewers want to hear, the correct answer IS "It Depends" because it does. Let's see what I mean...
First, a little test data... a million rows in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 15, 2010 at 6:45 pm
bitbucket-25253 (1/15/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 15, 2010 at 5:23 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 40,276 through 40,290 (of 59,098 total)