Viewing 15 posts - 39,376 through 39,390 (of 59,072 total)
Heh... never mind. I didn't read the original post carefully enough.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 10, 2010 at 11:54 pm
Paul White (3/10/2010)
Jeff Moden (3/10/2010)
That kind of presupposes that you know what order the delimited parameter is going to be in, doesn't it? 😀
Nope. My reading of the requirement...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 10, 2010 at 11:52 pm
Heh... not so sure about that. The article on Triangular Joins actually started out as a single post... including the graphics.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 10, 2010 at 11:46 pm
Oh I agree that a CLR would be the thing to do here. No question about that. It's just that not all Developers (or even DBA's) have a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 10, 2010 at 11:43 pm
Agreed... there are many ways to do one thing. I just think that, for the reasons previously stated, transactional replication from prod to dev would be the wrong thing...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 10, 2010 at 11:24 pm
That kind of presupposes that you know what order the delimited parameter is going to be in, doesn't it? 😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 10, 2010 at 11:21 pm
Very cool. Thank you for the feedback.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 10, 2010 at 11:18 pm
Jack Corbett (3/10/2010)
Elliott W (3/10/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 10, 2010 at 9:49 pm
You're welcome. Thank you for the feedback.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 10, 2010 at 9:43 pm
Heh... I did beat around the bush a bit, huh? 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 10, 2010 at 9:37 pm
Well done!
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 10, 2010 at 9:34 pm
True enough. But if you can't or won't use a CLR solution, one of the myriad Tally table solutions will do the job very quickly as well especially in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 10, 2010 at 9:07 pm
MelissaLevitt (3/10/2010)
I convinced my boss not to concanate.
Why? It's about the only option you have in 2000. Use the function I demo'd in the article for 2000.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 10, 2010 at 8:02 pm
mjarsaniya (3/9/2010)
my dotnet application generate new records based on some criteria and it is always row by row.
Ummm... you could possibly do the same thing in a stored procedure. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 10, 2010 at 6:57 pm
James A Dionne (3/10/2010)
Muddy...might as well be Oil....Of to the search engine I go. Thanks for the help on this though it was a HUGE help.Jim
Heh... understood. So,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 10, 2010 at 6:45 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 39,376 through 39,390 (of 59,072 total)