Viewing 15 posts - 39,331 through 39,345 (of 59,072 total)
Paul White (3/14/2010)
Jeff Moden (3/14/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2010 at 9:03 pm
RBarryYoung (3/14/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2010 at 9:02 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (3/14/2010)
Those QODs and posts add up, though be careful of burnout. I've seen this happen before a few times. Do what you enjoy,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2010 at 1:43 pm
Paul White (3/14/2010)
Where have all the questions gone? Seems very quiet...perhaps too quiet...
Heh... you've answered them all. 😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2010 at 1:39 pm
Paul White (3/14/2010)
EAV :sick:You can use sparse columns when you get to SQL Server 2008. Or XML now. Probably other things too.
Heh... user defined columns :sick:... that's the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2010 at 1:37 pm
Paul White (3/14/2010)
You're quite right. In many ways, I wish I had resisted the temptation to post the Heap insert thing. The correct thing to do here would...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2010 at 1:34 pm
Ok.... so far, I'm at a total loss as to why the formulas I wrote don't have a more even distibution. Sooooo.... I'll use the power of the computer...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2010 at 1:04 pm
Holy Moly! The distribution of "R" and "T" suck with my method! I don't quite understand it because the distribution of "C" is nearly flat as you would...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2010 at 11:29 am
Paul White (3/13/2010)
It does raise a question, though: in which order should we allocate?You have chosen 'cars', then 'trucks', then 'RVs' - but that seems a bit arbitrary.
I initially thought...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2010 at 10:34 am
CirquedeSQLeil (3/13/2010)
Jeff Moden (3/13/2010)
Steve Jones - Editor (3/13/2010)
... and if MS listens, I hope we get a tempdb for each db
Lordy, I hope that doesn't happen. Imagine trying to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2010 at 10:22 am
wwei (3/14/2010)
Thank you for your posts and queries. That would help. Particularly, the 'Records inserted into a HEAP will come back in insertion order...' lets me...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2010 at 10:01 am
patrick 98158 (3/11/2010)
I will call a stored procedure that INSERT INTO Table1 by selecting an existing record.
My intention is not to change the stored procedure, by having to explicitly code...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2010 at 9:43 am
The durations for the time people spend "In" in the test data are ridiculously low which may indicate a problem with the base system. None the less, this will...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 13, 2010 at 8:34 pm
That's not the original question and it won't help with the original question.
You've clearly identified it as performance problem in the code...
When I ran the below queres, I'm getting High...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 13, 2010 at 5:42 pm
Thanks for the feedback, wwei.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 13, 2010 at 5:28 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 39,331 through 39,345 (of 59,072 total)