Viewing 15 posts - 39,331 through 39,345 (of 59,098 total)
wiernyjacek (3/15/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 15, 2010 at 2:23 pm
karthik -450760 (3/15/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 15, 2010 at 2:20 pm
steve-893342 (3/15/2010)
INSERT #ConnectivityTest
SELECT BulkColumn
FROM OPENROWSET (
BULK 'C:\ConnTest.txt',
FORMATFILE = 'C:\grasshopper2.fmt',
FIRSTROW = 1
) AS Z
--WHERE NOT BulkColumn...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 15, 2010 at 2:16 pm
steve-893342 (3/15/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 15, 2010 at 7:14 am
Paul White (3/14/2010)
Jeff Moden (3/14/2010)
Heh... user defined columns :sick:... that's the real problem. 😉
True. I worked with an application once that shared a schema across all customers...and any customer...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 15, 2010 at 6:41 am
Paul White (3/14/2010)
sinamora (3/14/2010)
thanks for all. it's very help me 🙂Looks like Jeff isn't getting his answer.
Heh... Diodes, check valves, and one way streets are useful tools... just not on...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 15, 2010 at 6:38 am
Joy Smith San (3/12/2010)
I've found that when I had to use linked servers, OPENQUERY provided much faster results.
It's amazing..! Open query is too fast...to be precise, it fetches data...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 15, 2010 at 6:31 am
Ajit-297150 (3/15/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 15, 2010 at 6:27 am
madhuri-425013 (3/15/2010)
Thanks for your suggestions. I am posting the output of the results which needs to come.
my table contains below data
tbl1
-------
name dt
xxx 01-Apr-2010
xyz 02-May-2010
abc 01-Mar-2010
results should come like below
name dt
xxx...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 15, 2010 at 6:14 am
Kevin Butterworth (3/15/2010)
That way the location could be used to return the gender, allowing compliance with California style legislation as it spreads around the world.
Heh... Avoid needing to be compliant...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 15, 2010 at 6:01 am
Heh... you must really be bored, Paul. 🙂 It does show, however, what a PITA a Cursor is compared to the simple Set-Based methods.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 15, 2010 at 5:50 am
Eoin (3/15/2010)
That's what's known in the business as a "Scream Test"
Heh... I didn't have a name for it but that'll do perfectly. 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 15, 2010 at 5:41 am
You're welcome... the only thing that's left is doing a "SUM" by day and the midnight "split". The SUM can be done easily (sorry, don't know why I didn't...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 15, 2010 at 5:38 am
But not too complicated...
SELECT TOP (1)
...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2010 at 10:58 pm
My feedback would be that you shouldn't learn how to use a Cursor until you've really learned and understand Set-Based progamming.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 14, 2010 at 10:34 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 39,331 through 39,345 (of 59,098 total)