Viewing 15 posts - 38,701 through 38,715 (of 59,098 total)
Garadin (4/30/2010)
Danny Sheridan (4/30/2010)
(wish I went to college for CS or DB Development/Management :ermm:). Learn something new everyday!
You could probably count on one hand the number of regulars...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 30, 2010 at 6:48 pm
I would say the following snippet of your code will probably keep all deletes from happening...
AND
UserClientMetaDataId NOT IN (SELECT USERCLIENTMETADATAID FROM dbo.LPBSecurity_UserClientSignature)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 30, 2010 at 6:44 pm
squidder11 (4/30/2010)
Many thanks for all the codeVery helpful thanks
To help you out with what "The Dixie Flatline" is saying above, please see the article at the first link in my...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 30, 2010 at 6:36 pm
Jacob Pressures (4/30/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 30, 2010 at 6:27 pm
keywestfl9 (4/30/2010)
Producttyp2col1 col2
A22
A02
A11
A20
B 2 ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 30, 2010 at 6:22 pm
Whisper9999 (4/30/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 30, 2010 at 6:08 pm
Dennis Wagner-347763 (4/30/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 30, 2010 at 7:15 am
Madhivanan-208264 (4/30/2010)
But what...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 30, 2010 at 7:11 am
anshu84onnet (4/28/2010)
Hi this is the scenario please solve this query waiting for immediate response please
Please send $1,000 USD to my PayPal account as a down payment and I'll get started...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2010 at 3:46 pm
Contact the folks at MOSS 2007... they created the problem and they need to fix it. Simply shrinking TempDB now and again isn't going to do anything except frag...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2010 at 3:38 pm
It's a "simple" 2 dimensional split. Please see the following article for some different methods to handle such a thing.
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63003/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2010 at 3:32 pm
a1011 (4/29/2010)
RowIDDatecreated Event
112010-04-01 06:16:16.6230
212010-04-01 12:25:18.9400
312010-04-01 20:03:07.1101
412010-04-01 20:40:27.2170
522010-04-01 09:48:42.4500
622010-04-01 09:51:24.8900
722010-04-01...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 29, 2010 at 3:21 pm
To learn how to do this in the future, please see the following article...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Crosstab/65048/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 28, 2010 at 8:42 am
I'd say "It Depends". In theory, they should have about the same execution plan. In reality, you need to turn on SQL Profiler and check out things like...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 28, 2010 at 8:39 am
Steve Jones - Editor (4/26/2010)
On plagiarism, my alma mater has some free software:http://digg.com/u1UU6a. I could host something using this if someone wants to help code.
Sorry Steve... I'm missing it... "help...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 27, 2010 at 9:42 am
Viewing 15 posts - 38,701 through 38,715 (of 59,098 total)