Viewing 15 posts - 38,356 through 38,370 (of 59,072 total)
Nah... you're alright. The post I left above will direct people to the original thread.
Just so you know, a lot of the heavy hitters don't look at the individual...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 16, 2010 at 12:33 pm
Yes... step 1... fix the following code... "ID" isn't a valid datatype unless they've done something really different in 2k8 or you have a user type squirreled away somewhere that...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 16, 2010 at 12:26 pm
Please... no posts here so we don't split up any answers that may come down the pipe... the original post is at the following URL...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic922564-391-1.aspx
Mike... don't double post. I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 16, 2010 at 12:23 pm
Lowell (5/16/2010)
i just saw something with that same question here that woudl probably answer the question more completely.
😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 16, 2010 at 12:18 pm
amrakhjaaa (5/16/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 16, 2010 at 12:15 pm
neelsmail (5/16/2010)
I thought I did.. but perhaps I didn't understand your question.
I am trying to call the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 16, 2010 at 12:04 pm
aabrar.jnu (5/16/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 16, 2010 at 11:53 am
neelsmail (5/16/2010)
Set based operations - yes, that was the first thought that came to my mind as well and in fact I suggested it. But, unfortunately, for...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 16, 2010 at 11:12 am
sjsubscribe (5/16/2010)
SSMS is probably the weakest link in the entire SQL tool chain.
How so?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 16, 2010 at 11:10 am
{edit} Still testing... comment removed. Sorry.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 16, 2010 at 10:42 am
Paul White NZ (5/16/2010)
Jeff Moden (5/15/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 16, 2010 at 9:48 am
Absolutely agreed on all points. There's many ways to skin this particular cat.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2010 at 6:41 pm
I don't believe people encrypt their stored procedures to keep anything proprietary secret because, as you've so very adequately noted, just about everything that can be done in SQL Server...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2010 at 6:39 pm
I posted the following on Paul's good blog...
The problem is that we keep putting bandaids on stab wounds. Instead of deprecating features, the features should be repaired to provide incredible...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2010 at 6:22 pm
Explain the difference between set based code and RBAR in terms of internals, execution plans, philosophy, and implimentation.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 15, 2010 at 6:06 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 38,356 through 38,370 (of 59,072 total)