Viewing 15 posts - 37,921 through 37,935 (of 59,072 total)
Thomas-282729 (6/25/2010)
Nick Walton (6/25/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 25, 2010 at 7:53 am
mike 57299 (6/23/2010)
Jeff Moden (6/23/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 25, 2010 at 7:44 am
Michael Jenck (6/25/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 25, 2010 at 7:38 am
eq2home (6/24/2010)
WITH CUBE
This feature will be removed in a future version of Microsoft SQL Server....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 25, 2010 at 7:13 am
Eugene Elutin (6/24/2010)
Jeff Moden (6/24/2010)
Eugene Elutin (6/24/2010)
Jeff Moden (6/23/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 24, 2010 at 7:52 am
quackhandle1975 (6/24/2010)
DTS data copy with transformations bombed out after and hour so went with BCP file out from source db - which created a 4GB...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 24, 2010 at 7:43 am
Eugene Elutin (6/24/2010)
Jeff Moden (6/23/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 24, 2010 at 7:12 am
{edit - comment withdrawn}
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 23, 2010 at 8:34 pm
Are you sure it was "data points"? Data points can be "points" of data in XML, points (usually in pairs) on a chart, parts of an algorithm, or just...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 23, 2010 at 8:12 pm
Ray K (6/23/2010)
select * from tableAjoin tableB on tableA.drug like '%' + tableB.drug1 + '%'
I think this is the correct syntax. (Someone correct me if I'm...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 23, 2010 at 7:57 pm
I haven't looked but isn't there something like a "Text Qualifier" property?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 23, 2010 at 7:47 pm
Actually, this is a duplicate post which has already been answered at the following...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic941870-392-1.aspx
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 23, 2010 at 7:35 pm
hl6a (6/23/2010)
I am learning some basics about TSQL performance tuning. Some of the terms are confusing to me. Could somebody answer this simple question? Thanks.
The simple answer is "Yes" with...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 23, 2010 at 7:30 pm
huston.dunlap (6/23/2010)
Thank you for the answer. Sorry I got a little snide in that last post, wasn't the best day for me.
So let's ask the real question... do you need...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 23, 2010 at 7:24 pm
Unlike your other post, this one could probably be done but it would relegate most of your code to dynamic SQL. Why do you need to do this? ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 23, 2010 at 7:15 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 37,921 through 37,935 (of 59,072 total)