Viewing 15 posts - 36,736 through 36,750 (of 59,072 total)
Yep... sorry, Peter. I meant to say that I tested that method, as well. It's not nearly as bad as the original dot version but, you're correct, it's...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 17, 2010 at 6:18 am
I'm curious... Why do the folks that imposed this requirement think that it's a good idea to do?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2010 at 10:01 pm
SSISLearner (9/16/2010)
Is there any way to get this list from a single query using CTE's.
The query that Wayne wrote will certainly do the "single query" thing correctly. Just be...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2010 at 9:57 pm
laddu4700 (9/16/2010)
I have used ISNULL function and wrote a below T-SQL statement, but...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2010 at 9:46 pm
laddu4700 (9/16/2010)
But some of the tables columns data have NULL values. I need to replace the NULL...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2010 at 9:44 pm
SysEdw (9/16/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2010 at 9:40 pm
Derrick Smith (9/15/2010)
Ah crap, I did. Didn't even notice that. Hard to follow the logic of this query..working on it.
BWAA-HAAA!!! You have to learn to roll the "R" in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2010 at 9:38 pm
Mike01 (9/15/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2010 at 9:36 pm
Probably the best thing to do would be to make a "helper table" with the numbers 1 to 31 in it and the character ordinals. Then, use the table...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2010 at 9:29 pm
Wow... I guess my machine doesn't like XML so much. I stopped the test after 10 minutes on a 10K by 100 run.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2010 at 7:21 pm
Peter Brinkhaus (9/13/2010)
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.Split8KX_Inline(@Parameter VARCHAR(MAX), @Delimiter VARCHAR(1))
RETURNS TABLE
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
RETURN
...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2010 at 6:58 pm
Brad Schulz (9/16/2010)
Here's the key to the mystery as to why you and I get differing results.
All of my tests included compile time also, because I did a DBCC FREEPROCCACHE...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2010 at 6:56 pm
Paul White NZ (9/16/2010)
GilaMonster (9/16/2010)
Steve Jones - Editor (9/16/2010)
What's humour? You hanging out with Brit's in TN?He's finally learnt to spell properly. 😀
Perhaps a course on the correct use...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2010 at 2:47 pm
Steve Jones - Editor (9/16/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2010 at 2:25 pm
gonickl (9/16/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2010 at 2:02 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 36,736 through 36,750 (of 59,072 total)