Viewing 15 posts - 36,301 through 36,315 (of 59,067 total)
First, my humble apologies for how long this has taken... I've been pretty busy.
Second, let's expand the test a bit. Let's say that we got a day's worth of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 6:22 pm
ta.bu.shi.da.yu (10/21/2010)
Jeff Moden (2/6/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 6:37 am
GSquared (10/20/2010)
it's been worse than every other standard hierarchy implementation that I know of
What do you mean, Gus? How has it been worse? Implementation, performance, easy of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 20, 2010 at 3:20 pm
Stefan Krzywicki (10/20/2010)
ALZDBA (10/20/2010)
GSquared (10/20/2010)
Jeff Moden (10/19/2010)
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (9/21/2010)
Paul White NZ (9/21/2010)
The current SQL development model is to address a small number of main product features in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 20, 2010 at 3:17 pm
Paul White NZ (10/20/2010)
GSquared (10/20/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 20, 2010 at 3:16 pm
Randy Emerson (9/21/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2010 at 11:34 pm
jkeys-972541 (10/19/2010)
I have set up a derivative of the above function on several databases and worked fine. On the last database I got the error:
Msg 4138, Level 16, State...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2010 at 11:23 pm
Marv-1058651 (10/19/2010)
I am dumping these records into one table to then use for a Crystal Report, thats why I am deleting my results before the proc executes.
It doesn't solve your...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2010 at 11:06 pm
greg 2201 (9/24/2010)
Here is one approach for regularizing data into time "bars" that I found, posted on dbformus: http://www.dbforums.com/microsoft-sql-server/1660120-regularizing-time-intervals.html#post6478463It runs very slowly however due to all the "group by" activity.
Soooooo.......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2010 at 10:53 pm
Stefan Krzywicki (10/19/2010)
Jeff Moden (10/19/2010)
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (9/21/2010)
Paul White NZ (9/21/2010)
The current SQL development model is to address a small number of main product features in each new...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2010 at 9:55 pm
sturner (10/19/2010)
Just so the original poster doesn't think I'm a grouch and since others did point a few of the more obvious problems, I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2010 at 4:59 pm
gah (10/19/2010)
CELKO (10/18/2010)
1) Learn the differences between rows and records, columns and fields; it will help.
Apologies for going off topic here, but I am confused by this statement above.
BOL states...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2010 at 4:46 pm
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (9/21/2010)
Paul White NZ (9/21/2010)
The current SQL development model is to address a small number of main product features in each new major release. The...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2010 at 4:33 pm
Paul White NZ (9/21/2010)
Gianluca Sartori (9/21/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2010 at 4:27 pm
Gianluca Sartori (9/21/2010)
Paul White NZ (9/20/2010)
Steve Jones - Editor (9/20/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 19, 2010 at 4:25 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 36,301 through 36,315 (of 59,067 total)