Viewing 15 posts - 36,286 through 36,300 (of 59,067 total)
gmrose (10/21/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 11:29 pm
You can always raise an error to the SQL log file.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 10:34 pm
WayneS (10/21/2010)
Did you ever post about this? Counting you and me, there's only about, well, 2 people that know what you're talking about here.
Nope... that's going to be in the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 10:23 pm
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (9/20/2010)
Eric Russell 13013 (9/20/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 9:30 pm
CELKO (10/20/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 9:23 pm
Kit G (10/20/2010)
CELKO (10/20/2010)
...Columns hold values, not values or formulas.
Ah, the vagueness of the English language... I don't quite understand your last sentence, Joe.
Are you saying that columns can hold...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 9:22 pm
Kit G (10/20/2010)
Hope I didn't step on your toes, Jeff. 😀
Nope... you did just fine and your great explanation is where I was going with it all. Very well...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 9:18 pm
I guess I'd have to be there to look at the whole thing. I'm out of "remote" ideas on the problem. My apologies.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 9:09 pm
ta.bu.shi.da.yu (10/21/2010)
Jeff Moden (10/21/2010)
ta.bu.shi.da.yu (10/21/2010)
Jeff Moden (2/6/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 9:02 pm
Paul White NZ (10/19/2010)
Jeff Moden (10/19/2010)
I prefer your simplified row number checker. It doesn't slow down much and doesn't have problems with unbalanced sets that Hugo's code does.
Thanks. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 8:52 pm
ALZDBA (10/20/2010)
Dito.And it only serves a single purpose. i.e. strict hierarchy.
Ever tried building a family tree ?
Thanks for the input, Johan. Heh... from what I've seen, even nested sets...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 8:46 pm
Stefan Krzywicki (10/20/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 8:43 pm
Grant Fritchey (10/20/2010)
Jeff Moden (10/20/2010)
Paul White NZ (10/20/2010)
GSquared (10/20/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 8:41 pm
GSquared (10/21/2010)
Jeff Moden (10/20/2010)
GSquared (10/20/2010)
it's been worse than every other standard hierarchy implementation that I know of
What do you mean, Gus? How has it been worse? Implementation,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 8:21 pm
chuckneerg (10/21/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 21, 2010 at 8:11 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 36,286 through 36,300 (of 59,067 total)