Viewing 15 posts - 34,801 through 34,815 (of 59,099 total)
WayneS (3/4/2011)
Jeff Moden (3/4/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2011 at 9:33 am
pverma (3/4/2011)
Thanks for the prompt reply.
But it seems u have misunderstood my post.
The "pipe" used in the post is just for structuring the data in a table format.
Kindly execute the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2011 at 9:27 am
LutzM (3/4/2011)
gemni7 (3/4/2011)
But again, there are at least three reasons Jeffs code is recommended for such scenarios: speed, performance and duration 😀
Heh... that's a nice thing to say, Lutz. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 4, 2011 at 5:50 pm
gemni7 (3/4/2011)
I have a question about Exclusive Table Lock. What would be SQL servers behavior if my application open connection to insert data into same table while exclusive table...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 4, 2011 at 5:49 pm
Sean Lange (3/4/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 4, 2011 at 3:26 pm
aureolin (3/4/2011)
Remember: 50% of all doctors graduated in the bottom half of their class!
Oh! Now THERE's a scary thought, for sure.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 4, 2011 at 11:40 am
Cool. Thanks, Gus. I'll give it a try and read up on it in BOL but simple examples like the one you provided go a very long way...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 4, 2011 at 11:37 am
Substitute a "pipe" for the comma's in the following article...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/comma+separated+list/71700/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 4, 2011 at 10:04 am
stewsterl 80804 (3/4/2011)
"change the parameter to a table variable" - Brilliant!!! 😀Thanks!
If you get the chance, please, I'd love to see the code that you end up with for that....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 4, 2011 at 9:48 am
Thank you very much for the feedback... but Lutz set the stage to avoid RBAR using some very high performance code. All I did was tweek his code. 🙂
As...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 4, 2011 at 9:35 am
Send me an email, CC.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2011 at 10:59 pm
Gosh. We should setup a poll. I wonder how many DBAs subscribe to the idea that it's ok to lose data on a production system... SLA or not......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2011 at 10:38 pm
Heh... or just do it all in T-SQL stored procedures. :-D:-P;-)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2011 at 10:17 pm
You don't understand what I'm saying. There is no way to know if a word is a part of the city or part of the address for any of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2011 at 10:13 pm
LutzM (3/3/2011)
What needs to go into the ORDER BY clause of ROW_NUMBER() is sort of unclear based on the data provided so far:
If there will ever be a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 3, 2011 at 9:56 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 34,801 through 34,815 (of 59,099 total)