Viewing 15 posts - 32,896 through 32,910 (of 59,099 total)
doug 40899 (8/12/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 12, 2011 at 8:39 pm
Grant Fritchey (8/11/2011)
Brandie Tarvin (8/11/2011)
Grant Fritchey (8/11/2011)
Well done Brandie. The only real author I know and we still haven't met.
I think it's hilarious that you think you're not a real...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 12, 2011 at 6:37 am
Brandie Tarvin (8/11/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 12, 2011 at 6:31 am
Lynn Pettis (8/11/2011)
I was going to wait until tomorrow night, but it is close enough.
I am resigning...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 12, 2011 at 6:28 am
Kenney Hill (8/11/2011)
Plus you could always let slip something embarrassing or funny or both about Jeff in the article!:hehe:
Heh... the fact that I talk with the dust bunnies isn't bad...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 12, 2011 at 6:20 am
Bill Kline-270970 (8/11/2011)
Excellent article. A great example of why I come to SQLServerCentral.com . . . to learn from the best.
Thanks, Bill. :blush: I really appreciate the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 12, 2011 at 6:18 am
Apologies for my apparent absence on this thread. Looks like I have a bit more testing to do. Thanks John, Mark, and Peter.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 12, 2011 at 6:02 am
Chelo (8/11/2011)
The issue I have is similar to others. I received .txt files with the pipe or...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 11, 2011 at 1:36 pm
Please try Google. Search for SQL SERVER "BEST PRACTICES".
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2011 at 10:39 pm
Ninja's_RGR'us (8/10/2011)
doug 40899 (8/10/2011)
Ok so I was told just a moment ago that both hour and minute would need to be included in my SP. What's the syntax for that?
SELECT
--removes...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2011 at 7:55 pm
Jon Russell (8/10/2011)
As usual, excellent! Thanks, Jeff.
You bet, Jon. Thanks for stopping by and for the feedback.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2011 at 6:31 pm
lstrashnoy (8/10/2011)
I actually agree. I used this code in mySQL and it works pretty efficient. Unfortunately SQL Server not optimizing the way mySQL does. And because it has to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2011 at 6:30 pm
Paul Herbert (8/10/2011)
A minor correction if you don't mind. If you are going to quote my 'Really?!", I think it needs both...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2011 at 6:28 pm
Gosh... I wouldn't use CHECKSUM for such a thing. It's nothing but a simple Exclusive OR and getting duplicate CHECKSUM values for different data is much more likely than...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2011 at 6:14 pm
Hear here! This editorial should be required reading for anyone involved with data especially the managers that want the data turned into information. Well done, Steve!
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 10, 2011 at 6:00 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 32,896 through 32,910 (of 59,099 total)