Viewing 15 posts - 32,506 through 32,520 (of 59,099 total)
Ninja's_RGR'us (9/21/2011)
SQLRNNR (9/21/2011)
Ninja's_RGR'us (9/21/2011)
SQLRNNR (9/21/2011)
Ninja's_RGR'us (9/21/2011)
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (9/21/2011)
Just a note, in case you didn't see it, Jeff's interview is up: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Exceptional+DBA+Awards/75986/
Forget that crap, this is even better!
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/FindPost1179084.aspx
CELKO...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 22, 2011 at 9:35 am
{Edit} Post withdrawn... still testing and posted too early.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 22, 2011 at 7:24 am
Michael A. (9/21/2011)
The issue is that the current WHILE logic will stop once the values within one array are exhausted.
Hmmm... been thinking about this... Sean's code does a great job...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 22, 2011 at 7:21 am
I couldn't say it before but I'll definitely be there. Thank all of you for making it possible!
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 21, 2011 at 9:25 pm
Harveysburger (9/21/2011)
Thumbs up from CuraΓ§ao
Thank you and good to "see" you again. Is Roy going to let you go to PASS with him this year?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 21, 2011 at 9:18 pm
ken.trock (9/21/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 21, 2011 at 9:16 pm
Roy Ernest (9/21/2011)
Evil Kraig F (9/21/2011)
*claps* Rock on ya old whitebeard! Us younguns are still learnin' every day from ya! π
You a youngun? :hehe:
Great job Jeff.....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 21, 2011 at 9:06 pm
Evil Kraig F (9/21/2011)
*claps* Rock on ya old whitebeard! Us younguns are still learnin' every day from ya! π
Heh... I'm really only 23! Guess I'm going...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 21, 2011 at 9:03 pm
Chris Harshman (9/21/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 21, 2011 at 8:48 pm
Jim Murphy (9/21/2011)
I look forward to meeting you at The Summit in a few weeks!
I especially appreciate your spirit of giving. Let me...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 21, 2011 at 8:45 pm
sql_lock (9/21/2011)
Simply, well deserved!!!
Thank you for the feedback. I aim to please. I sometimes miss, but I'm always aiming. π
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 21, 2011 at 8:31 pm
opc.three (9/21/2011)
Congratulations Jeff, and Thank You for all you do π
Thanks, Orlando. I've not forgotten the pair of articles you and I want to write together. It's going...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 21, 2011 at 8:25 pm
sharath.chalamgari (9/21/2011)
Congrats Jeff, this will be really inspirational for other sql folks.
Thanks, Sharath. I really do hope this helps inspire others especially when it comes to sharing knowledge. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 21, 2011 at 8:21 pm
Anipaul (9/20/2011)
We should also thank Rich Bay and your boss π for the "accident", otherwise...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 21, 2011 at 8:08 pm
boeledi (9/21/2011)
I have 2 tables with the very same LONG structure (table_1 and table_2).
I was wondering if it would be possible to update table_1 with the content of table_2 without...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 21, 2011 at 3:47 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 32,506 through 32,520 (of 59,099 total)