Viewing 15 posts - 32,086 through 32,100 (of 59,099 total)
ulfemsoy (10/12/2011)
If you only want to get the day index, you should check the following description:
You don't need a UDF for this...
SELECT (DATEDIFF(dd,'17530101',GETDATE())-1) %7
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 31, 2011 at 10:05 pm
kpao (4/1/2006)
I've found that there is a function called "trftime" in Sqlite. However, I cannot find any function like this in T-SQL. Is there any function to do this?
You really...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 31, 2011 at 10:02 pm
drew.georgopulos (10/25/2011)
We have a programmer who has been experimenting with reporting services, but making this individual a server administrator is creating great anxiety among the database admins.
Don't do it. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 31, 2011 at 9:58 pm
GREAT editorial, Tony. People just don't know what they miss by not going to PASS or other SQL Server events. Lots of good technical info, especially for an...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 31, 2011 at 9:55 pm
What I'm even more interested in is that the data appears to be a "hierarchical path" structure. It also appears to be incorrect. Lines 7 and 14 should...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 31, 2011 at 9:49 pm
I just saw the picture for the article and it looks like even the pumpkin got dressed up for Halloween... it looks like one of Steve's Hawaiian shirts. 😛
Ok... OLD...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 31, 2011 at 9:27 pm
Alan Vogan (10/31/2011)
Going as a computer geek is good, but add some reality...go as a Zombie Computer Geek! Extra bloodshot eyes, white rotting flesh, coffee stained teeth....oooooooo!
Hey HEY! C'mon......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 31, 2011 at 9:12 pm
Brian Ki (10/31/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 31, 2011 at 9:07 pm
sdownen05 (10/31/2011)
You are right, Lynn. I didn't give you enough sample data. However, I have figured out a way around it. Thank you for your help.Steve
Two way street here, Steve....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 31, 2011 at 8:56 pm
RuanK (10/31/2011)
...but the thing is, the more I learn, the more I realise what I don't know and this actually scares me.
You, good Sir, have just explained one of the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 31, 2011 at 8:53 pm
Evil Kraig F (10/31/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 31, 2011 at 8:48 pm
Evil Kraig F (10/31/2011)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 31, 2011 at 8:38 pm
Evil Kraig F (10/31/2011)
You guys are looking at a race.;-)
Nah... no race here. I've just been a regular poster for 7 or 8 years. If it's 8 years,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 31, 2011 at 7:38 pm
Evil Kraig F (10/31/2011)
Jeff Moden (10/31/2011)
Kiara (10/31/2011)
Jeff Moden (10/29/2011)
Any interest in a bit of table redesign that will greatly improve performance for this particular query? One that will give...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 31, 2011 at 7:28 pm
gcresse (10/31/2011)
Am I expecting too much?
I believe so. What you're trying to do is actually breaking Rule 5 which stipulates "No Joins". The Sub-queries you're running are correlated...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 31, 2011 at 7:22 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 32,086 through 32,100 (of 59,099 total)