Viewing 15 posts - 30,856 through 30,870 (of 59,101 total)
TheSQLGuru (3/6/2012)
Note that the locks taken for the DELETE in this case could be PAGE locks, in which case there could be potentially hundreds of thousands of rows available for...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 6, 2012 at 8:02 pm
SAinCA (3/6/2012)
(Not my architecture, so please avoid commenting on the presence of RBAR :-D)
Heh... you posted it so if there were comments to be made about RBAR, you'd just...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 6, 2012 at 7:50 pm
jay.dunk (3/6/2012)
Using nolock is quite risky and is getting used more and more these days to avoid locks, but it DOES come with issues which i only found out a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 6, 2012 at 7:43 pm
I haven't tested it yet but I believe your main problem is that you used SMALLDATETIME in the tables which are accurate only to the nearest minute.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 6, 2012 at 4:31 pm
jcb (3/6/2012)
create table TESTE (PK int, C1 char(1), C2 char(1), C3 char(1), C4 char(1), C5 char(1))
GO
insert into TESTE values
(1, 'a',...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 6, 2012 at 4:26 pm
We have the ol' language barrier thing going on here. I know you want to change the GUI to a "sequence" and that you think you need a function...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 6, 2012 at 4:21 pm
SQLKnowItAll (3/5/2012)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 6, 2012 at 6:22 am
chandarcst (3/5/2012)
Hi,I want to learn sql and tell me the way
Let me ask the questions that we should have asked at the beginning. How long have you been using...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 6, 2012 at 6:16 am
p.s. There shouldn't have been a problem with the original peice of code you posted unless you had something else in the WHERE clause that was causing a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 6, 2012 at 6:12 am
I'm pretty confused, right now. Guess I've not had enough coffee, yet. I see no differences between the first two peices of code above.
{Edit} I was right......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 6, 2012 at 6:09 am
Golden_Behzad (3/6/2012)
This is Very good suggest .
but i connote used this suggest
because my application have about 20 user
and for do this action i must be recreate my...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 6, 2012 at 6:05 am
Hi Terry,
Thanks for the feedback. Heh... since you recognized it as "integer truncation", I'm pretty sure that I don't actually know more than you. 🙂 I just get...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2012 at 10:32 pm
Jeff Moden (3/5/2012)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2012 at 6:10 pm
Eric M Russell (3/5/2012)
Henk Schreij (3/5/2012)
(a solution,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2012 at 2:34 pm
ddafunk (3/5/2012)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 5, 2012 at 8:14 am
Viewing 15 posts - 30,856 through 30,870 (of 59,101 total)