Viewing 15 posts - 26,311 through 26,325 (of 59,099 total)
taigovinda (8/3/2013)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 3, 2013 at 9:34 am
niladri.primalink (8/3/2013)
I have a stored procedure named 'Bacs_ValidProcessingDateList' when I execute this procedure it is working fine.
It shows me 2568 records. How Can I use top clause with this?
I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 3, 2013 at 9:23 am
david.wright-948385 (8/3/2013)
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (8/2/2013)
...we had some authors of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 3, 2013 at 9:21 am
taigovinda (8/2/2013)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2013 at 11:03 pm
Forgot about the original problem. Since you've already determined that some data exceeds both NVARCHAR(4000) and VARCHAR(8000), then one of the MAX datatypes is appropriate although I'd try to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2013 at 10:45 pm
taigovinda (8/2/2013)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2013 at 10:38 pm
This doesn't answer your question but I've always questioned the use of the Resource Governor on jobs. You know the jobs are there and you know they're going to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2013 at 10:00 pm
taigovinda (8/2/2013)
Thanks. Given that info I will stick with max as I have no need to index by these columns. 😀Tai
Before you jump to that conclusion, please consider the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2013 at 9:35 pm
David McKinney (8/2/2013)
As regards why the article got marked down, I'd suggest that it's because you didn't mention the obvious solution.
You want to sort by the month...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 2, 2013 at 7:44 am
Be careful about what you use SET STATISTICS on. If you have any scalar functions in the query, they can look hundreds of times worse than they are because...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 1, 2013 at 9:40 pm
I can't help in SSRS but, as a sort of "bump" for you, what kind of total are you looking for?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 1, 2013 at 9:34 pm
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (8/1/2013)
jasona.work (8/1/2013)
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (7/31/2013)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 1, 2013 at 9:05 pm
JoshDBGuy (8/1/2013)
mister.magoo (8/1/2013)
Millions of rows shouldn't be a major problem unless those rows are massively wide...for instance, on my PC I can shift...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 1, 2013 at 8:46 pm
Durai Samuel (8/1/2013)
Please check if this link helpshttp://www.dotnetbites.com/find-user-modified-table-stored-procedure
That's got some serious errors in it. Although it happens frequently, no result set is guaranteed to be in the same order...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 1, 2013 at 4:29 pm
Really good "Spackle", Brandie. Our shop enforces the 2 part naming convention for everything and we do 100% peer reviews before anything leaves Dev so we know to check...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 1, 2013 at 7:38 am
Viewing 15 posts - 26,311 through 26,325 (of 59,099 total)