Viewing 15 posts - 10,366 through 10,380 (of 22,213 total)
Excellent. Please post back with the results.
September 27, 2012 at 3:28 pm
I think you're on the right track, yes. The function sure sounds like the primary cause.
As to the IN statement, with a really small one like this with hardcoded...
September 27, 2012 at 10:10 am
THREADIZENS!
Who is going to make it to any of the SQL in the City events coming up in the next week+?
September 27, 2012 at 9:03 am
You can also try XML. Parsing XML can be a somewhat memory intensive process, but moving that much data is already going to be memory intensive, so it might be...
September 27, 2012 at 8:51 am
You can use the Profiler GUI to playback a trace against a server. But, it's single threaded, so you're not going to be able to scale it up much. SQL...
September 27, 2012 at 8:43 am
You sort of can't. Not really. There's no way to break down memory, cpu or I/O by database in that manner.
However, what you can do is capture the query metrics,...
September 27, 2012 at 8:35 am
Mainly if it does what it says on the box. I've got a chapter in there, but I haven't seen all the other chapters. I'm curious how the team did....
September 27, 2012 at 4:55 am
Like it says in the article:
To use sys.dm_os_buffers as part of a monitoring process, you just have to look for the two events, RESOURCE_MEMPHYSICAL_LOW or RESOURCE_MEMVIRTUAL_LOW. These are available in...
September 27, 2012 at 4:30 am
The amount of space used by the database isn't determinative of the log size. It's the transactions that come through. You can have a gigantic database, but a very small...
September 26, 2012 at 2:23 pm
I've got a detailed blog post on what's going on here[/url]. As noted, you need to backup the log file. You can change the database to simple recovery and...
September 26, 2012 at 11:35 am
If the optimizer still thinks, based on statistics, a different index is more selective than your filtered index, that would explain why it's being selected. I can't say beyond that...
September 26, 2012 at 7:58 am
Yeah, we're comparing apples to hammers to a degree. If there are varying loads on the servers, other differing executables, etc., then you can't really compare resource usage between them.
September 26, 2012 at 7:11 am
So, how's the material? You're reviewing more of the rough & ready aspect of getting the alpha, which is cool, but I'm curious how we did on the meat.
September 26, 2012 at 7:09 am
For those interested, it's worth mentioning that Red Gate SQL Backup[/url] has an automation routine built into the newest release that makes backup testing a lot easier. It will do...
September 26, 2012 at 4:25 am
It does depend on how you defined "used". You could also take a look at the index usage statistics to see how often a clustered index (which is a table)...
September 26, 2012 at 4:04 am
Viewing 15 posts - 10,366 through 10,380 (of 22,213 total)