Viewing 15 posts - 7,246 through 7,260 (of 22,213 total)
spaghettidba (11/12/2014)
Thanks for correcting me, Grant.Sorry for posting incorrect information.
Not a correction, an enhancement.
November 12, 2014 at 6:33 am
Unclear how many transactions you're dealing with. That can still affect your choices. Is the system going to be OLTP or Reporting focused? That's also going to affect how it...
November 12, 2014 at 6:25 am
Oh yeah, I've seen that before. It comes from several sources. It could be that you're dealing with table variables or multi-statement table valued user defined functions. Because they don't...
November 12, 2014 at 6:16 am
Just no way to say without the query and the execution plan to understand what's happening and why.
November 12, 2014 at 4:44 am
I'm with Gianluca on this. It's hard to tell you what the problem is without actual error messages.
Do you have a backup available? It sounds like you might need to...
November 12, 2014 at 4:43 am
Which event did you use? Showplan XML Statistics Profile will capture actual plans. But, it has an extremely high overhead. Because trace has such lousy filtering, I don't recommend you...
November 12, 2014 at 4:39 am
Some other issues include the fact that while the indexes on in-memory tables have statistics, you can't see the statistics information using DBCC SHOW_STATISTICS. Further, because of this, while the...
November 11, 2014 at 10:23 am
From the slides on the precon I did last week at Summit, this is just a list of table restrictions:
Restrictions
No LOB
No CLR
No user defined types
No VARIANT
No ROWVERSION
No foreign keys
Must have...
November 11, 2014 at 10:21 am
No. No, no, no. Don't do that. Everything just doesn't belong within the in-memory sphere. If you're not experiencing significant slow downs due to latch waits, you really shouldn't even...
November 11, 2014 at 10:05 am
No, there is no way to "push" a table to be in-memory. You must create an in-memory table following all the restrictions and then move the data into that table....
November 11, 2014 at 8:57 am
In addition to the good suggestions so far, you should also factor in the number of transactions each supports. The recovery process of the restore operation when transactions are rolled...
November 11, 2014 at 7:22 am
Thank you for the kind words.
I don't know that I would sweat adding the additional 8 bytes. It's not that much. Yes. it'll be a little wider, but if...
November 11, 2014 at 4:40 am
You have to make a determination for hardware through a whole slew of factors. How much data do you anticipate? How many users will there be? How many transactions will...
November 11, 2014 at 4:08 am
Did you try connecting with the dedicated admin connection (DAC)? I've seen that work in similar circumstances. And yeah, I think your devs might be out to lunch on this...
November 11, 2014 at 3:58 am
I'd go right by 2012 and use 2014. The licensing costs are about the same, and the number of enhancements to 2012 functionality around things like columnstore, statistics, statistics maintenance,...
November 11, 2014 at 3:52 am
Viewing 15 posts - 7,246 through 7,260 (of 22,213 total)