Viewing 15 posts - 7,156 through 7,170 (of 22,226 total)
Not even a good guess. Now, frankly, I'm curious. I'm with Steve. Set this one fire and move on... after you capture the wait stats.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
December 4, 2014 at 7:57 am
I just remember, I wrote an article on just this topic[/url].
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
December 4, 2014 at 7:48 am
yeah, if you want to explore multi-server management, you certainly can schedule them to run across multiple servers.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
December 4, 2014 at 7:46 am
Weird.
I tried to replicate it. Standard worked just as fast as Enterprise on the VM I created.
Have you tried capturing wait stats before and after running the create database command?
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
December 4, 2014 at 7:18 am
Yeah. It'll generate a script, or you can generate a report of the differences, or both. All from the command line. I forget the syntax, but it's in the documentation.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
December 4, 2014 at 5:02 am
OK. I'm back.
I spun up an Enterprise server taking all the defaults and then created a database. It only took about 3 seconds (if that). Maybe this is on Standard?...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
December 4, 2014 at 4:46 am
And because you're selecting everything, that's all stored with the clustered index, hence the scan.
How many rows is it returning out of how many rows in the database?
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
December 4, 2014 at 4:17 am
Check the wait stats before and after the query runs on the slow machine to understand what is causing it to slow down. Also, compare the execution plans between the...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
December 4, 2014 at 4:15 am
I know I work for Red Gate now, but, prior to working for Red Gate, I had SQL Compare open on my desk pretty much every day. Plus, you can...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
December 4, 2014 at 4:13 am
Instead of using a linked server, what about using OPENQUERY?
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
December 4, 2014 at 4:06 am
That's a weird one. And it's Enterprise that's causing the problem?
I haven't seen it, but I'll go spin up a VM and see what happens.
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
December 4, 2014 at 4:02 am
I prefer using OPENQUERY to linked servers so that I can pass parameters to the linked machine in order for it to do as much filtering of data as possible...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
December 4, 2014 at 4:00 am
But, if it's a data warehouse, does it need to have point in time recovery? If not, maybe Simple would work for you.
You'll still need to set the transaction...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
December 4, 2014 at 3:57 am
Nope. Backups are just databases. If you want to move only a table you need to set up some kind of ETL process. The common tool is SQL Server Integration...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
December 2, 2014 at 3:38 pm
ScottPletcher (12/2/2014)
Robert Frasca (12/2/2014)
ScottPletcher (12/2/2014)
Robert Frasca (12/2/2014)
ScottPletcher (12/1/2014)
I suggest creating a covering index on:
SourceFactTimeCard ( TimecardIndex, EmployeeID )
If SQL...
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood"
- Theodore Roosevelt
Author of:
SQL Server Execution Plans
SQL Server Query Performance Tuning
December 2, 2014 at 10:39 am
Viewing 15 posts - 7,156 through 7,170 (of 22,226 total)