Viewing 15 posts - 7,036 through 7,050 (of 22,213 total)
Pretty sure it will connect, yes. But, you will be better off in terms of support with the upgraded client.
December 19, 2014 at 3:28 am
It's probably the same plan, but there will be two of them because you have what would be considered two different queries because of the different aliases.
December 19, 2014 at 3:25 am
Other than that fact that there's no WHERE clause to filter the data output, I can't see anything immediately wrong with the query.
There are changes in the optimizer and...
December 19, 2014 at 3:23 am
I think testing is the way to go on any of this. But, also check the index usage stats to see if they've been used. If an index has been...
December 18, 2014 at 8:00 am
Tac11 (12/18/2014)
I know both have toll. what would you do on production db backup? only CHECKSUM? CHECKSUM AND RESTORE VERIFYONLY? OR VERIFYONLY?
There are caveats to all this, but the article...
December 18, 2014 at 6:01 am
First, you're estimated to be moving 2.9 million rows into temp tables and that's coming from four scans against your tables. That's just to load #temp_violation. That's going to be...
December 17, 2014 at 9:25 am
Check the error log. You can see when backups were fired off there. I think, but would have to look it up to be sure, it's also in the system_health...
December 17, 2014 at 8:29 am
Jason-299789 (12/17/2014)
PiMané (12/17/2014)
Cause the pk when it's created will already point to the cidx and wont need rebuild/recalculate. Less work on the io system and cpu.
I thought all the NC...
December 17, 2014 at 8:27 am
You can get the estimated execution plan without ever running the query at all. That's the place to start.
December 17, 2014 at 7:21 am
WayneS (12/17/2014)
Jeff Moden (12/17/2014)
Koen Verbeeck (12/17/2014)
Brandie Tarvin (12/17/2014)
Brandie Tarvin (12/16/2014)
I just spent 2 & 1/2 days reworking a package and its supporting tables / stored procedures. Previous time of...
December 17, 2014 at 7:19 am
Not seeing the execution plan it's hard to make suggestions as to where exactly it's running slow. Are you sure you have indexes in place that support the query you're...
December 17, 2014 at 7:00 am
Instead of MIN why not try a TOP 1 with an ORDER BY to get the dates in the correct order. You should even be able to have an index...
December 17, 2014 at 4:19 am
PiMané (12/17/2014)
Jason-299789 (12/17/2014)
having done something similar, it was a...
December 17, 2014 at 4:14 am
Brandie Tarvin (12/16/2014)
I just spent 2 & 1/2 days reworking a package and its supporting tables / stored procedures. Previous time of execution between 8 - 12 hours.
Current execution...
December 16, 2014 at 3:31 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 7,036 through 7,050 (of 22,213 total)