Viewing 15 posts - 21,766 through 21,780 (of 22,184 total)
I have to agree. In a real interview situation this code would scare me off.
June 1, 2007 at 5:17 am
Great response. First, I was joking about actually using this as an interview question. However, the excercise is interesting because it does force you to apply logic and a bit...
June 1, 2007 at 5:15 am
I have to say I was really surprised at how much response this little article generated. I dashed it off after we had our fun with it. I didn't think...
May 30, 2007 at 5:04 am
Ladies... The signal to noise ratio is starting to drop a bit. This was supposed to be a bit of candy for some intellectual stimulation a little bit different than...
May 29, 2007 at 3:42 pm
Looks cool. I'm going to pass it out to the team & see what they think.
May 29, 2007 at 12:12 pm
All true. Honestly we only allowed it to pass because all the answers we were getting were so damned pathetic. We also allowed people count dropping and recreating the proc...
May 29, 2007 at 8:07 am
I just wish it was only people interviewing for their first jobs. We're getting people with 5-8 years of "experience" that don't know the answer. I'd attribute it to nervousness,...
May 29, 2007 at 7:51 am
Forgive us our typos. Absolutely. The most you'd get gigged for only going to 99 is some good natured ribbing about being premature or something.
It's amazing how much discussion what...
May 29, 2007 at 5:39 am
Yikes.
I haven't seen that many GOTO's in quite a while. Nice job.
May 29, 2007 at 5:26 am
Absolutely more appropriate languages than SQL. I'm not serious about putting this on an interview. This was just some geek fun that we had one morning at work. Actually we...
May 29, 2007 at 5:22 am
Oh boo. That's so procedural. Not set based at all.
What? Are you some kind of developer or something?
Nice job though.
May 29, 2007 at 5:15 am
Viewing 15 posts - 21,766 through 21,780 (of 22,184 total)