Viewing 15 posts - 15,286 through 15,300 (of 22,211 total)
Lynn Pettis (4/28/2010)
Brandie Tarvin (4/27/2010)
April 28, 2010 at 8:35 am
Nope. I'm not seeing that.
April 28, 2010 at 8:28 am
I was thinking the same thing, plus, how the heck big are the transaction logs?
April 28, 2010 at 8:22 am
Check the TSQL to see the execution plans & tune as needed. Validate that the SSIS package is not performing scripts or operations that prevent the pipeline from acting in...
April 28, 2010 at 8:18 am
Wesley Brown (4/28/2010)
I'd seriously think about calling MS support on this one.
Concur. That sounds like a serious problem.
April 28, 2010 at 8:13 am
Yeah, I figured updateusage was a total waste of time, but it was niggling at my head, so wrote it down.
If consistency is good.... it's the OS or the SAN...
April 28, 2010 at 7:22 am
Personally, I'd say yes, use the APPLY operation, but, as with all things, you should test both, look at the execution plans, the performance time, and then make the determination...
April 28, 2010 at 7:15 am
Depending on the data types, of course a few million records could produce a difference of 20gb. Actually, the data types involved must be quite small for several million records...
April 28, 2010 at 7:13 am
d.srikanth50 (4/28/2010)
on monday to saturday at 3:30a.m.i have to schedule diferential backups also on everyday.
please guys let me...
April 28, 2010 at 7:10 am
Will do. I was being lazy with the link and got caught. Sorry :crying:
April 28, 2010 at 6:59 am
Although, again, I'd suggest a quick query against sys.dm_exec_query_stats. Order by physical/logical reads or physical/logical writes and you'll see the queries currently in cache that are hitting the system hard...
April 28, 2010 at 6:57 am
Ninja's_RGR'us (4/28/2010)
Assuming this job has already run succesfully in the past :
1 - Either the permissions changed (NTSF or sql login)
2 - You're out of space on...
April 28, 2010 at 6:53 am
GilaMonster (4/28/2010)
p.s. In SQL 2005, you cannot force an index seek. You can force an index to be used but you have no control over how it will...
April 28, 2010 at 6:47 am
The fact is that data is neither stored nor retreived in precise order. Without the ORDER BY, that I'm not telling you to use, you have no guarantee how the...
April 28, 2010 at 6:44 am
Have you run consistency checks on the databases? I'd be quite concerned about that. Also, you could try DBCC UPDATEUSAGE. I don't think it'll help, but it's the first thing...
April 28, 2010 at 6:42 am
Viewing 15 posts - 15,286 through 15,300 (of 22,211 total)