Viewing 15 posts - 1,276 through 1,290 (of 49,552 total)
ThomasRushton - Wednesday, June 14, 2017 4:23 AMHang on. You've got your test environment on the same hardware as your production environment?
I...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 14, 2017 at 4:24 am
What's your question?
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 14, 2017 at 4:16 am
You don't need a group by on that query, as it has no aggregation.
Group By in SQL is used to do aggregations (sum, avg, count, min, max, etc) per...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 13, 2017 at 10:49 pm
Short of DBCC Page, no.
Why are you interested?
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 13, 2017 at 3:12 pm
No, it's a hash index. The indexes you have for in-memory tables are either hash indexes or range.
Specifying HASH or NONCLUSTERED HASH gets you a hash index, specifying...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 13, 2017 at 9:08 am
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 13, 2017 at 7:31 am
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 13, 2017 at 6:41 am
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 13, 2017 at 4:02 am
There wouldn't be, they do exactly the same thing.
Double-check what databases the checks were run on.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 12, 2017 at 1:36 am
No, the stats are going to be up to date because you just created the index.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 11, 2017 at 5:09 am
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 11, 2017 at 5:07 am
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 11, 2017 at 5:04 am
Reduce the fill factor slightly. Test and repeat until acceptable.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 11, 2017 at 5:03 am
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/stairway/72399/
http://www.sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/category/sql-server/indexes/
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 10, 2017 at 12:12 pm
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
June 10, 2017 at 11:15 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,276 through 1,290 (of 49,552 total)