Viewing 15 posts - 5,431 through 5,445 (of 49,552 total)
NorthernDBA (7/2/2015)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 2, 2015 at 6:25 am
Almighty (7/2/2015)
normal trend is that features of enterprise edition of earlier version are included in standard version
No, it's not. In fact, the only feature I can think of that...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 2, 2015 at 5:50 am
The decisions as to what's Enterprise and what's Standard will likely be made much closer to release.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 2, 2015 at 5:49 am
John Mitchell-245523 (7/2/2015)
If any SPIDs have eight rows, then your change has been successful.
No. MaxDop limits the number of running threads a query may have, not the total number of...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 2, 2015 at 5:35 am
Table variables are only visible in the scope where they are defined. They're like normal variables. Since you declared the table variable outside the dynamic SQL, it's not visible inside...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 2, 2015 at 5:31 am
It's an inefficient split function, but whether it's the problem or not is impossible to tell from the information available.
No, you can't move that to the client, because it's...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 2, 2015 at 2:49 am
jasona.work (7/1/2015)
You know a topic is going in a bad direction when Gail starts copying-and-pasting a previous reply from the same topic...
I don't recall doing that in the last couple...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 2, 2015 at 2:24 am
Zip the .sqlplan file and attach the zip. Since it's XML, it compresses very well.
The one you captured from Profiler please.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 1, 2015 at 9:54 am
Look in Books Online (the SQL help documentation) on sys.master_files or sys.database_files for what the values mean.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 1, 2015 at 9:13 am
Rod at work (7/1/2015)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 1, 2015 at 9:10 am
Can you post the query at least? The execution plan you captured would also be rather useful
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 1, 2015 at 9:00 am
SELECT * FROM sys.master_files
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 1, 2015 at 8:50 am
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (7/1/2015)
AFAIK, the order of columns in the include doesn't matter.
Correct.
Order of columns matters in the key, not in the include
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 1, 2015 at 8:49 am
Feasible, but probably not a good idea.
Unless the query which uses the smaller one is so time-sensitive that it cannot possibly take a millisecond longer, you're probably best off merging...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 1, 2015 at 7:29 am
SQLRNNR (6/30/2015)
Alvin Ramard (6/30/2015)
Is it ok to suggest dropping...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 1, 2015 at 4:47 am
Viewing 15 posts - 5,431 through 5,445 (of 49,552 total)