Viewing 15 posts - 23,146 through 23,160 (of 49,552 total)
MyDoggieJessie (9/30/2011)
Do you know if there's a way to get around it? Without having to redo EVERYTHING?
Without the checkDB output, no.
You can drop a database involved in replication as...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 30, 2011 at 4:24 pm
If it is corrupt, it's an option.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 30, 2011 at 4:04 pm
In general, for any form of stack dump, call Microsoft Customer Support and open a case.
This however looks like database corruption. Error 5242 is:
An inconsistency was detected during an internal...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 30, 2011 at 3:51 pm
waxingsatirical (9/30/2011)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 30, 2011 at 10:29 am
I wasn't talking about the stored procedure.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 30, 2011 at 9:56 am
While you're off on Google, may I suggest you read up on SQL Injection. Your code is vulnerable.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 30, 2011 at 9:45 am
At least the size of the index (in kB or MB), probably more because of the overhead of log header, log block header, etc.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 30, 2011 at 9:34 am
CGSJohnson (9/30/2011)
Hmmm...that's interesting, Gail. What would be the point of that scenario -- sitting the MCITP before the MCTS?
I did it because I got beta invites for...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 30, 2011 at 9:01 am
frfernan (9/30/2011)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 30, 2011 at 8:33 am
Pretty much the same as switching to simple recovery. Discards all log records that are no longer needed, breaks the log chain. Lets you shrink the log back to a...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 30, 2011 at 8:00 am
For basic indexing, have a look at this series (3 parts): http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Indexing/68439/
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 30, 2011 at 7:41 am
GSquared (9/30/2011)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 30, 2011 at 7:37 am
At least the total size of all the indexes rebuilt between two log backups. Probably more.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 30, 2011 at 7:31 am
Or switch the database to simple recovery
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 30, 2011 at 7:30 am
frfernan (9/30/2011)
So my conclusion is that this index contains the primary key, even when it's not explicitly defined.
Not the primary key. Nothing to do with the primary key. The clustered...
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
September 30, 2011 at 7:27 am
Viewing 15 posts - 23,146 through 23,160 (of 49,552 total)