Viewing 13 posts - 196 through 209 (of 209 total)
Oops, my bad... 2005 seems so far away now 🙂
November 11, 2009 at 3:03 am
I reckon this thread has pretty much said all it's going to :doze: Credit to the QOD author; fair point to (some of) the criticisms; let's call it a day.
October 2, 2009 at 2:13 am
It may have been the intention to design the question in that way, but nothing in the question shows its heart to be about extensions any more than it is...
October 1, 2009 at 12:19 pm
I'd warn against routing backups to a central location and from there to other locations. The source of the data (the database server) is a bottleneck you can't avoid. The...
August 10, 2009 at 2:23 am
The other point to consider is whether the backup file was compressed by Sql Server (Enterprise/Dev edition only). If not, depending on the computing power available and the capacity/capability of...
July 27, 2009 at 3:27 am
... or see http://www.ssmstoolspack.com/Main.aspx
July 23, 2009 at 8:15 am
I take your point about it being good exercise for the mind - quite so. But in the real world, if you rely on the database behaving in a particular...
November 26, 2008 at 10:09 am
I reckon it's a good example of bad practice just because the outcome isn't defined 🙂
November 26, 2008 at 8:44 am
Viewing 13 posts - 196 through 209 (of 209 total)