Viewing 15 posts - 2,731 through 2,745 (of 3,658 total)
I've just tested this against a 50,000 record table with record length 4468 and a none unique varchar column that is part of a compound index.
In both cases the execution...
May 26, 2005 at 2:34 am
This recent article http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/jBulinckx/indexedviewswithouterjoins.asp showed how to do outer joins with and indexed view.
If you replace your SELECT * statement with explicit column names do you get any improvement in...
May 26, 2005 at 1:57 am
If you watch the locks using Enterprise Manager while your program is running do you seen anything significant?
Are the long running inserts being blocked by the shorter ones?
Does your logging...
May 24, 2005 at 1:35 am
I would be extremely suprised to find that Windows defrag and Diskeeper were the same product.
No-one would willingly buy a product that was as bad as Windows defrag.
May 24, 2005 at 1:11 am
I think the problem is that as you gain seniority you get promoted and assigned to lead teams without anyone giving any advice or training on how to go about...
May 23, 2005 at 2:12 pm
The built-in Windows 2000 defrag is absolutely rubbish. You need at least 15% free disk-space to do a defrag and even if you have the tool will tell you...
May 23, 2005 at 8:02 am
I too have misgivings about the CLR. I've read somewhere that there are people in Microsoft who have misgivings. Something to do with a badly written piece of...
May 17, 2005 at 1:41 am
Nice debate Joe.
Short circuiting has been true of in every SQL you know about. I didn't know but I do now. Perhaps I should buy some of your...
May 16, 2005 at 1:47 pm
OK, so EXISTS short circuits. Great. One less thing to worry about.
I would hardly call using stuff that has been in MS SQL Server since version 7 (and...
May 16, 2005 at 8:02 am
sp_help 'your table name here'
Brings back all sorts of information on the table including the primary key.
May 16, 2005 at 7:23 am
Joe, does EXISTS short out SELECT * FROM..?
If you are programming for SQL Server then why ignore valid SQL statements?
If I am going to develop for cross platform compatibility then...
May 16, 2005 at 7:19 am
If you are going to do it Joe's way then perhaps
UPDATE Poz
SET tip = 'k'
WHERE EXISTS
(SELECT TOP 1 J.con
...
May 16, 2005 at 2:02 am
Well, the field itself will simply reject any date that isn't in the correct format but if you had a stored procedure to do some bespoke error handling you could...
May 13, 2005 at 1:46 am
Yes, continuous push replication. Only the tables are replicated.
I solved the problem by removing the triggers but the idea that the inserted table contains NULL values in the field...
May 12, 2005 at 9:59 am
If you are adding an IDENTITY field to an existing table this suggests that the table doesn't already have a primary key and doesn't link to anything. It may...
May 11, 2005 at 1:27 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 2,731 through 2,745 (of 3,658 total)