Viewing 15 posts - 2,191 through 2,205 (of 3,659 total)
I have a situation where the different lines of business have specific databases but there is a common database that is shared by all lines of business.
The common database is...
October 19, 2007 at 2:33 pm
The problem is that the database is the bed-rock of modern applications.
If a web-server in a server farm has a memory leak due to dodgy code then an restart isn't...
October 19, 2007 at 1:21 pm
The one place I have seen a cursor used where it would be difficult to use set based logic was where the results in a row of a particular query...
October 16, 2007 at 1:42 pm
I can't remember where the quote comes from but it was along the lines of "An organism that ceases to explore its environment is in decline and is ultimately doomed"....
August 2, 2007 at 1:19 pm
It would be nice if there was a simple document that listed all the features that are going to be deprecated and all those that are to be replaced. It...
July 25, 2007 at 12:05 pm
I was asked to review a performance issue on a database and came to the conclussion that a covering index would offer a massive boost in performance. I tried...
July 22, 2007 at 2:29 pm
I would get rid of the SELECT *.
I've had problems when the underlying table structure changed but the stored proc did not pick up the changes.
I would also switch to...
July 22, 2007 at 2:17 pm
If you are doing searches and retrievals that use all the fields in index 2 then stick with index 2.
Remember an index will be ignored if the query optimiser thinks...
July 16, 2007 at 1:42 pm
How often does the data warehouse get populated?
If it is a periodic load then having the database in simple recovery mode is OK. When you do a data load...
July 16, 2007 at 1:36 pm
CHAR is fixed length where as VARCHAR is variable length so VARCHAR should use less space than CHAR. The only caveat is that VARCHAR fields need to store something...
July 16, 2007 at 1:31 pm
Chris, it is obsolete.
When I built the original solution I used temporary tables however I found that views worked just as well and the temporary tables weren't needed.
The error is...
July 9, 2007 at 11:33 am
Depends on your permissions but you can do DROP db.dbo.view just as you can do SELECT * FROM db.dbo.view
July 6, 2007 at 1:43 pm
No, only one table at a time can have INDENTITY_INSERT ON.
What exactly are you trying to do?
July 6, 2007 at 1:40 pm
Run the trace without using the profiler. The profiler GUI slaughters performance.
July 2, 2007 at 2:39 pm
Where separation in 'n' tier applications CLR functions have little use because each component is a specialised resource.
Where the SQL Server is more of a one-stop-shop then the CLR functions...
July 2, 2007 at 2:31 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 2,191 through 2,205 (of 3,659 total)