Viewing 15 posts - 2,041 through 2,055 (of 2,640 total)
Both #temp tables and table variables may or may not be created in memory or on disk - it's a matter of available resource.
Your use of one type of...
July 14, 2006 at 7:19 am
yes you can issue cross database commands -- I think you can handle the use command by executing script files using osql - which you can do from QA /...
July 14, 2006 at 3:37 am
There's no automated system to enforce change control on sql objects, whatever system you use will not stop someone making an edit to a proc through EM. It's a bit...
July 14, 2006 at 2:37 am
I'm not too sure you can do this.
July 14, 2006 at 2:34 am
Well I guess the application wasn't properly tested then ?
mail me direct and I can send some routines/code you can use to at least isolate your problems - the stuff...
July 14, 2006 at 2:26 am
This article should have been updated prior to re-publish as there are some errors and misconceptions contained within it. Sorry.
July 14, 2006 at 2:10 am
Your question is far too vague for a sensible answer. Try reading this book ( I know it's 2k but all principles apply )
http://www.compman.co.uk/scripts/browse.asp?ref=450145
To be honest if you don't...
July 13, 2006 at 8:45 am
I'd didn't think you could use express - but I see you can try this
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/dbmirror.mspx
July 13, 2006 at 4:10 am
A DW will always be much larger than it's oltp database as it stores effectively point in time snapshots and is likely to be denormalised.
I disagree about dimension members -...
July 13, 2006 at 3:58 am
agreed .. never claim to be an expert .. you'll be immediately shot down - sql server is so vast you'll never know it all, and someone will always know...
July 12, 2006 at 3:02 pm
absolutely, all depends. Star schema are easier to maintain and obviously less complex than a snowflake. I've used both , it's the end result that is important, if it requires...
July 12, 2006 at 5:24 am
yeah sorry I forgot the first column of my covered index was very selective, if the first column isn't selective enough then you're absolutely correct, the optimiser will ignore it....
July 12, 2006 at 4:50 am
Cool! if I get to attend, which is unlikely as I think I'll be on a new contract, I'll do my best to find you! I attended the one day...
July 11, 2006 at 7:35 am
excellent Jeff!
and a dba gains another grey hair !!
July 11, 2006 at 7:01 am
Well originally covered indexes could be fussy about column order in the index matching column order in the select. It shouldn't make any difference and I've to date not found...
July 11, 2006 at 6:22 am
Viewing 15 posts - 2,041 through 2,055 (of 2,640 total)