Viewing 15 posts - 2,026 through 2,040 (of 2,640 total)
technically you should normalise and create a lookup table to join against .. vs ... your choice to method is to which is least likely to break your application(s) , which...
July 18, 2006 at 9:38 am
with very great care, and after asking yourself if you really want to do this! If it's a production or critical server then probably you don't.
July 18, 2006 at 9:35 am
I'd advise against using autoshrink, this may compact your extents increasing mixed extents and degrading performance, it might also autoshrink at an inconvenient time.
I assume your table has a large...
July 18, 2006 at 9:32 am
I guess you have an index on items.type ? restricting this selection might help .. But .. I bet items.type is a poor index ??
so you could try a composite...
July 18, 2006 at 9:23 am
sorry but both temp tables and table vars start in memory - depending upon resource ( and data set size ) each may or may not spool out into a...
July 18, 2006 at 9:10 am
yes! Well actually it depends upon all sorts of things including internal/external etc. etc.
I'm not sure about using two channels with raid 5, I've done this with raid 10 with...
July 18, 2006 at 9:04 am
You are correct that the sql server takes the machine name on first install.
A machine name rename does not change the sql server name.
The sql server name does not have...
July 18, 2006 at 6:10 am
The various sql elements should belong to the relevent resource group this would I assume include msdtc. ( Haven't a cluster to hand currently to check ) The whole point...
July 18, 2006 at 5:58 am
Check out the microsoft ALWAYS ON http://www.microsoft.com/sql/alwayson/default.mspx
this might help. It's really important that people realise that a SAN doesn't give any performance benefits becuase it's a SAN. SAN's assist...
July 18, 2006 at 5:12 am
It is the shared spindles that cause the most problems. The main issue I've encountered with SAN's is that I require say, 7 spindles for good performance, with 147Gb disks...
July 17, 2006 at 3:16 am
Running queries across linked servers will often likely give you problems, it's not best practice for performance. I believe you may need to use Openquery with pass through to resolve...
July 17, 2006 at 2:58 am
In certain circumstances, with more complex views , I've found that indeed the entire select * may be done within the view - not quite as you ask, in my...
July 17, 2006 at 2:49 am
select into can cause locking in a multi-user environment this has and still is clearly documented.
I don't want to get into silly arguments but don't throw VLDB into a forum,...
July 14, 2006 at 2:47 pm
Find another job and pass him the management of the Servers.
Did he explain the process by which he arrived at this ?
and what are you supposed to do with the...
July 14, 2006 at 8:53 am
You should never user select into . During the population of the temporary table by the select into statement the allocation block in the data file is locked - so...
July 14, 2006 at 8:37 am
Viewing 15 posts - 2,026 through 2,040 (of 2,640 total)