Viewing 15 posts - 5,896 through 5,910 (of 6,216 total)
Not bad Steve - have you considered just putting the VBScript into a job rather than as a DTS task?
Andy
September 12, 2001 at 5:50 pm
I'll try to get some sample code up tomorrow or Friday, got a lot going on this week. In the interim if you search MSDN for ado stream you should...
September 12, 2001 at 5:48 pm
You will also have to use named pipes for the connection to the 2nd or later instance if you're not running the latest MDAC (I think 2.6 or higher).
Nigel -...
September 12, 2001 at 5:46 pm
Hey now...since I haven't passed the 6.5 exam Im not a pro?!!
Joe, I'd say go for the SQL 7 exam since that is what you're using. As far as training...
September 12, 2001 at 5:42 pm
ASP will work. Biggest thing is your code gets all wrapped up in your UI. Depending on the scope of your project you may want to wrap DMO in an...
September 12, 2001 at 4:23 am
In fact you may not need to convert it - SQL does a fair job of figuring out that the value is a date. Run this code to see what...
September 11, 2001 at 7:23 pm
Thanks for the code Erik!
Andy
September 11, 2001 at 7:21 pm
I think the biggest difference is that you can't (I think, Im a VB guy, not ASP) is that you cant handle the events. For instance, if you want to...
September 11, 2001 at 3:41 pm
You're trying to mix two techniques. The easiest way is to use two ado recordsets, so you're just assigning the contents of one column to another, like this:
rsDestination.fields("ImageField")=rsSource.fields("ImageField")
Getchunk works, but...
September 11, 2001 at 3:15 pm
Here are a couple links from MSDN that may prove helpful:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q199/7/08.ASP
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q131/5/34.asp
I found what looks to be a pretty good article about upsizing to SQL from Access that I think also...
September 11, 2001 at 3:08 pm
How about trying the same task through Enterprise Manager? You can always drop the db if it works.
Andy
September 11, 2001 at 4:58 am
Makes you appreciate the work EM does behind the scenes on items like this doesnt it?
Andy
September 11, 2001 at 4:56 am
Well stated. The problem is that not only are we unlikely to convince them, it's not always realistic anyways. Gotta pay the bills first. I've tried to adopt the dual...
September 10, 2001 at 4:47 pm
How about this instead?
select * from main_table a
inner join (select rec_id, min(drop_date) as DropDate from drops where drop_date is not null group by rec_id) b
on a.record_id=b.rec_id
Andy
September 10, 2001 at 4:37 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 5,896 through 5,910 (of 6,216 total)