mtassin (10/5/2011)

---

I think a big part of this is the flavor of Normalization Kool-aid we're using.

For instance, this paper that's referenced isn't necessarily Normalization Form mainstream.

mtassin (10/5/2011)

---

Another note.. go to http://www.google.com and type in EKNF and BCNF. I know which one you'll get an immediate hit on.

Rob Schripsema (10/5/2011)

---

Who can explain why the fifth option, "A on its own is a candidate key of T" is NOT true? What am I missing here?

L' Eomot Inversé (10/5/2011)

---

I find it quite frightening that so few people know enough about normalisation to get this one right.

paul s-306273 (10/5/2011)

---

Not quite sure of the relevance of this question.

(Or is that just sour grapes - 2correct answers, 118 incorrect answers so far!)

L' Eomot Inversé (10/4/2011)

---

Comments posted to this topic are about the item <A HREF="/questions/Normalisation/74786/">Elementary Key Attributes</A>

OzYbOi d(-_-)b (10/4/2011)

---

Thanks & Good question.

L' Eomot Inversé (10/4/2011)

---

Good question.

I guess I'm glad that I don't know this answer from experience, just from reading.

My thoughts exactly Tom!

SQLRNNR (10/4/2011)

---

Dude63 (10/4/2011)

---

Ray K (10/4/2011)

---

crookj (10/4/2011)

---

Daniel Bowlin (10/4/2011)

---

Resistance is futile

Confrontation is inevitable

Evidence is indisputable

Corruption taints evidence

Emotion taints evidence

SQL Kiwi (10/4/2011)

---

I will, unusually, be supporting SA since the tradition here is to support whomever is playing Australia.