Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,101 through 5,115 (of 7,484 total)

  • RE: Variant order 1

    rfr.ferrari (11/30/2011)

    good question and explanation!!!!

    thanks Tom!!!

    But terrible answer!!

    November 30, 2011 at 7:15 am

    #1414661

  • RE: Variant order 1

    callie97 (11/30/2011)

    I got this question 'wrong' because the result of my query came back with v3 = v2, not v2 = v3. The value in the result set is...

    November 30, 2011 at 7:13 am

    #1414658

  • RE: Variant order 1

    Cadavre (11/30/2011)

    L' Eomot Inversé (11/30/2011)

    I replied too quickly before, didn't cover all bases before getting it wrong. I knew there wasn't a typo in the question, and didn't consider...

    November 30, 2011 at 6:54 am

    #1414637

  • RE: Variant order 1

    Cadavre (11/30/2011)

    Cadavre (11/30/2011)

    Got it wrong because I believe it should say "v3 = v2" not "v2 = v3"

    L' Eomot Inversé (11/30/2011)

    wloong (11/29/2011)

    I agreed!

    From the programming logic, "v2 =...

    November 30, 2011 at 6:34 am

    #1414625

  • RE: Variant order 1

    gary.mazzone (11/30/2011)

    Since the version is not specified if this is run on SQL Server 2005 then the Answer needs to be None of the above. Why do we ask.......

    November 30, 2011 at 6:27 am

    #1414619

  • RE: Variant order 1

    Hugo Kornelis (11/30/2011)

    Tom, please double check the question. The SQL text contains the string constant 'v3 = v2' as one of the CASE results. The correct answer option reads v2...

    November 30, 2011 at 6:22 am

    #1414615

  • RE: Variant order 1

    Henrico Bekker (11/30/2011)

    Hi Tom, if the question is "what would the statement return" then "v3=v2" is in fact correct, because that is what is returned when executing the code.

    I have...

    November 30, 2011 at 6:17 am

    #1414612

  • RE: Variant order 1

    Thomas Abraham (11/30/2011)

    Good question, excellent explanation. Now please explain:

    Crois-tu qu'on s'enivre pour s'amuser? Etre ivrogne ce n'est pas une sinécure... Si tu savais l'attention et la persévérance qu'il faut! Toujours...

    November 30, 2011 at 6:10 am

    #1414610

  • RE: Variant order 1

    erroneous post

    November 30, 2011 at 5:51 am

    #1414600

  • RE: Variant order 1

    stupid erroneous response edited out.

    November 30, 2011 at 5:48 am

    #1414596

  • RE: Variant order 1

    stupid erroneous repsonse to comment. edited away.

    November 30, 2011 at 5:44 am

    #1414593

  • RE: Today's Random Word!

    SQLRNNR (11/29/2011)

    ChrisM@Work (11/29/2011)

    Evil Kraig F (11/22/2011)

    SQLRNNR (11/22/2011)

    riddle

    Question Mark

    Mark is innocent!

    3rd degree

    Guantanamo

    November 29, 2011 at 9:57 am

    #1414218

  • RE: Insert Into problems

    Good question.

    It caught me, although it most certainly shouldn't have :blush:. Guess I shouldn't try to understand SQL until the hangover subsides :doze:

    November 29, 2011 at 6:57 am

    #1414034

  • RE: Are the posted questions getting worse?

    Kiara (11/28/2011)

    The rest, at least, translates out into something that does, at least, translate to something potentially intelligible. (Although I do suspect "idle rich" should replace "rich idle"... 🙂

    "rich idle"???...

    November 28, 2011 at 9:55 am

    #1413526

  • RE: Today's Random Word!

    Dev (11/28/2011)

    @tom: Changed avatar?

    Yes - changed avatar to match sig. Also changed sig to different quote from same author because one of the ladies reacted to the...

    November 28, 2011 at 7:36 am

    #1413445

Viewing 15 posts - 5,101 through 5,115 (of 7,484 total)