Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 363 total)
Deek, The above worked for me, but if your "TableName" is actually a VIEW or not a "Table", the so.type = 'u' is limiting your results. Try and so.type =...
January 27, 2004 at 5:25 pm
Frank,
I was looking forward to your response . I knew I could get you to write a "short story" length post
January 27, 2004 at 5:15 pm
Thanks Tony,
Thank god, just little (<MB - > ~ 10MB etc) files here and there, nothing scheduled or anything, just when we do some work on the LAN, and...
January 27, 2004 at 3:38 pm
Frank, I understand where you are coming from, and generally Erland's ideas are Ok I guess. but...
99.9% of my SQL work has no client interface at all, it's all just...
January 26, 2004 at 2:05 pm
Understood. So I had my SP named ExecSQLAsyncSP named right to start with.
Asynchronous = Parrallel
Synchronous =Serial
January 25, 2004 at 2:06 pm
Are you using the same login credentials in EM as when querying sysjobs?
January 25, 2004 at 11:37 am
I agree with the Backup / Restore statemnts above. Not sure, I believe you can actually use the backup file and attach it as the DB, In other words, the...
January 25, 2004 at 11:35 am
My "slant" was having a generic "hey SQL, go do [this], and come back right away, don't wait for [this] to finish".
I'll usually write an SP that handles all the...
January 25, 2004 at 11:28 am
I've posting into another thread http://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/shwmessage.aspx?forumid=49&messageid=97068 with SinLam on a closely related subject.
I think...
January 25, 2004 at 10:59 am
Ok, I'm writing this in Q/A 1st, then reply & paste.
Maybe I timed-out earlier ???? This post will be shorter
mainly because the network guys might have things for me
to do...
January 25, 2004 at 10:36 am
I could swear the old Active Threads listed them in reverse cronological order. Then again it might be me just not paying attention, or just plain short term memory thing...
January 25, 2004 at 9:30 am
Just do
EXEC SyExecSQLSyncSP 'EXEC BackupAndRestoreMyDB_SP'
The WAIT FOR, was just to demonstrate the processing would return to the current "scope" nearly instantly, while knowing the command issued Syncronously would take...
January 25, 2004 at 9:26 am
Darn-it, just typed 30 mins worth of stuff, hit "post" - all gone
Will re-write condesed version again in a few....
January 25, 2004 at 9:22 am
I guess your SQL Server has "no more work to do", go home, retire...
I know you've tried to cold restart the PC, right?
Did you install...
January 24, 2004 at 8:26 pm
I agree. I think I metioned this sometime before ???? Forgetting things now a days ... I would like to display the Active Topics...
January 24, 2004 at 8:15 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 363 total)