Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 584 total)
Appreciate the question. Had to think for a minute, as I almost never use OUTER joins.
A totally unrelated aside: Back from vacation. Missed the QotD. Didn't miss work.
Spent 17...
June 19, 2012 at 5:31 am
Just from the first 2 lines of code, I knew this was a bitbucket question. 🙂
Thanks for the easy (now that I've researched the topic) point.
I doubt I will be...
May 30, 2012 at 5:52 am
I guess I was not yet awake enough to have gone for tempdb. I also was lucky enough to come across:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic846325-146-1.aspx
Regardless of wording, learned something. Thanks for the question.
(edited to...
May 29, 2012 at 6:41 am
Thanks for the question. Thought it was a trick for a minute. Then went with the obvious (to me) answer of one. IF you think about it, since the master...
May 25, 2012 at 5:36 am
L' Eomot Inversé (5/24/2012)
DugyC (5/24/2012)
Basic computer science question, nice and easy, thanks.Can't believe almost a third got it wrong!
Bak to skool! 😛
"computer science" question? Since when was T-SQL operator...
May 24, 2012 at 7:13 am
Thanks for the question. Mission accomplished for me = learned something.
May 23, 2012 at 5:35 am
Got stuck in meetings, so I wasn't able to get to QOTD until later than usual. But, I enjoyed the lively discussion.
Dredged up a lot of things I learned...
May 22, 2012 at 10:18 am
Thanks for the question Koen! IT was Monday before I saw it, so we'll call this an easy one for Monday. Glad to have a chance to learn about 2012.
May 21, 2012 at 5:28 am
bitbucket-25253 (5/17/2012)
May 18, 2012 at 6:21 am
AlexSQLForums (5/17/2012)
Andre Ranieri (5/17/2012)
Followup question: What class of command is DBCC CHECKDB ? It doesn't seem to fall into the category of DML, DDL, DCL or TCL.Thoughts?
Andre
DBCC Class?
Your...
May 17, 2012 at 10:24 am
sknox (5/17/2012)
DBCC CHECKDB can repair corruption if you specify the REPAIR_ALLOW_DATA_LOSS option.
This is not always true (it depends on exactly where the corruption is), and...
May 17, 2012 at 7:38 am
Thanks for the question. Almost got it wrong due to speed reading wording about link-level consistency of BLOBS in the FILE SYSTEM. As others have mentioned, I knew I had...
May 17, 2012 at 7:36 am
Hugo Kornelis (5/16/2012)
According to this article[/url], you can check the current setting of SET XACT_ABORT by running SELECT 16384 & @@OPTIONS; - if the result is 16384, it is on;...
May 16, 2012 at 6:59 am
Hugo Kornelis (5/16/2012)The only way I can reproduce what you are seeing, both on SQL Server 2008 R2 (I don't have 2008 vanilla) and on SQL Server 2012, is by...
May 16, 2012 at 6:22 am
Hugo Kornelis (5/16/2012)No idea what went wrong. I copied and pasted the code above, hit execute, and got two rows back. SQL Server 2012. What version are you running?
SQL Server...
May 16, 2012 at 6:01 am
Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 584 total)