Viewing 15 posts - 4,021 through 4,035 (of 5,843 total)
Paul White NZ (5/5/2010)
TheSQLGuru (5/5/2010)
Wouldn't APPLY also force a nested loop iteration over each partition and thus also be slow?
Yes to the loop join - but that's exactly what is...
May 5, 2010 at 1:16 pm
Solomon Rutzky (5/5/2010)
aeternam (5/5/2010)
How would this query perform:
SELECT <something>
FROM <the partitioned table>
WHERE etp.PartitionID...
May 5, 2010 at 9:51 am
Numerous SQL Server MVPs (and lots of other users as well) have been screaming at Microsoft for years to improve partitioning. I hope improvements will be coming in later...
May 4, 2010 at 7:49 am
Paul White NZ (5/3/2010)
Florian Reischl (5/1/2010)
Hey PaulThanks for sharing this great article!
Best wishes,
Flo
Hey Flo, thanks very much! I'm a big fan of your blog by the way.
Can you give...
May 4, 2010 at 7:44 am
>>A DATETIME column with DEFAULT GETDATE() will work for single-row inserts, but if multiple rows are inserted in the same statement they will all have the same value.
Here is...
April 28, 2010 at 4:08 pm
Scott Coleman (4/28/2010)
April 28, 2010 at 4:03 pm
Whisper9999 (4/27/2010)
TheSQLGuru (4/27/2010)
April 27, 2010 at 8:05 am
Here's more insight for you: Low PLE simply means pages of data are being removed from the buffer pool so 'fresher' pages can be put in for processing. ...
April 27, 2010 at 7:38 am
maven.avi (4/27/2010)
Hope it helps.
Create table latest_value
(
[name] varchar(50)
)
go
Insert into latest_value
Select 'Avinash'
Union All
Select 'Suresh'
Union All
select 'Rahul'
Union All
Select 'Anil'
Union All
Select 'Zayed'
Union...
April 27, 2010 at 7:34 am
Paul White NZ (4/27/2010)
ondrej.bouda (4/27/2010)
Thats a good point of view: Tell to the optimizer all that you can know.Absolutely right!
+2!!
April 27, 2010 at 7:29 am
Jeff, didn't they completely remove support for "SELECT 1 FROM E01 a, E01 b" in SQL 2008 or 2008R2? I thought that non-ANSI stuff was going away. In...
April 27, 2010 at 7:28 am
Oopsie! Should have held my comments for another week or so - then it would have been considered a good segue into the next article. :hehe:
April 26, 2010 at 9:56 am
Number of rows isn't the only issue that can kill you with Table Variables. The actual VALUES can cause issue too, since you can't have statistics on TVs. ...
April 26, 2010 at 9:25 am
I have done this type of thing for numerous clients, with stunning results as you show. Actually usually better, because they are almost always encountered in multi-table-open-ended search scenarios....
April 26, 2010 at 9:22 am
I too would like to see more information on exactly what is required for the optimizer to be able to translate APPLY to a JOIN so it can use something...
April 22, 2010 at 10:03 am
Viewing 15 posts - 4,021 through 4,035 (of 5,843 total)