Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 133 total)
indeed but the problem is that i have several other values to pull from the row with the max seq.
what i seem to be getting is a mix of the...
May 4, 2004 at 7:08 am
is a left outer join faster than NOT EXISTS then ?
May 4, 2004 at 1:45 am
i'd still stick with the where clause for readability
April 30, 2004 at 9:43 am
i guess it might depend on your data somewhat
But. The where clause is where sql server would expect to find it.
I've always done joins on the values of one column...
April 30, 2004 at 7:47 am
Inded.
Although i WAS on the beta and am now not. I've moved companies.
Ironically the company i worked for were really lucky to be on the ascend program and they're not...
April 29, 2004 at 9:55 am
The learning curve will be steep, but I must admit this is the first time Microsoft has involved developers from ISVs from all over the world in beta testing and...
April 29, 2004 at 3:28 am
I agree with the post above but this issue about normalisation comes up again and again.
a 284 col table is plainly not normalised. databases seldom seem to be modelled and...
April 29, 2004 at 1:37 am
indeed - you really need to look at the design.
get someone who knows something about databases, lok at your data flow, create a design and implement it.
April 28, 2004 at 3:06 am
<snip>REMEMBER TO NORMALIZE YOUR DATA (IN TABLES)</snip>
Normalisation is a structure thing, not a data thing.
The use of cursors...
April 28, 2004 at 1:57 am
AFAIK no.
I think the viewing the execution plan of your query would tell you for certain. The restriction of the data (WHERE) should be done before the join but to...
April 27, 2004 at 3:14 am
It would be easier if we had an idea of the structure of your tables. Cursors can often be replaced with set based operations but it's difficult to say without...
April 27, 2004 at 3:10 am
There is some info on pivot tables in BOL.
Yukon will support pivot tables natively in the syntax but I think SS2K would need a stepped approach
April 27, 2004 at 3:06 am
Actually - a better rip from BOL is :
Microsoft® SQL Server™ provides three recovery models to:
April 26, 2004 at 5:17 am
this was ripped from BOL
With the Simple Recovery model, the database can be recovered to the point of the last backup. However, you cannot restore the database to the point...
April 26, 2004 at 5:13 am
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 133 total)